NYC-WTC_000186193
Draft environmental data report for the World Trade Center site prepared by IT Corporation for the EPA in November 2001.
19 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.965
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
neither asbestos nor SVF contributed to the elevated fiber counts. Sometimes mineral components of concrete (calcite and portlandite) and mineral components of building wallboard (gypsum, mica, and halite) were detected in air samples at higher estimated levels in lower Manhattan residential areas than in samples taken at comparison residential areas. These detected mineral levels are orders of magnitude below occupational standards. Although the occupational standards do not account for sensitive individuals or extended periods of exposure, they provide a comparison to an established health guidance value. The levels of minerals seen in airborne dust do not pose potential health hazards even for a continuous year of exposure at the highest levels detected.
INTRODUCTION
At 8:45 AM eastern standard time on September 11, 2001, a commercial jetliner struck the north tower of the World Trade Center (One World Trade Center). At 9:03 am, the south tower (Two World Trade Center) was also struck by a commercial jetliner. The south tower began to collapse at 10:05 am. At 10:30 am, the north tower began to collapse. (1,2,3,4)
The collapse of these structures released massive amounts of dust and debris that covered lower Manhattan. Residents were evacuated from many areas south of Canal Street. On September 19, pedestrian and vehicular traffic restrictions for below Canal Street were modified (5). As residents moved back into the areas, they requested information on the safety of the dust and air in the area and the types of cleaning methods that should be used. The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene provided guidance on cleaning for area residents and requested federal assistance in assessing potential exposures to airborne and settled surface dust that entered residential ai’eas following the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings.
BACKGROUND A. World Trade Center Towers
The World Trade Center was a complex of 7 buildings on 16 acres surrounding a 5-acre plaza in lower Manhattan. The complex was bounded by Vesey Street on the north. Church Street on the east. Liberty Street on the south, and West Street on the west. The twin towers were the center of the complex. Each tower had 110 floors; the north tower was 1,368 feet tall and the south tower was 1,362 feet tall. Each tower had approximately 43,200 square feet on each floor. There were seven underground levels that contained services, shopping areas, and a subway station. There were two plaza buildings (WTC 4 and WTC 5) on Church Street that had nine stories. WTC 7 was a 47-story office building. Design and structure details of the towers are shown in Table 1 (1,2,3,4,6). Basic location and U.S. Census population information about lower Manhattan is provided in Table 2 and Figures 1 through 4.
10
CITY_21MC100_011171447
NYC-WTC_000232978
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000186193
Draft environmental data report for the World Trade Center site prepared by IT Corporation for the EPA in November 2001.
19 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.965
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149537
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
41 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗33 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.983
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
23 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.973
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.973
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
23 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.973
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
23 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.973
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178388
Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
43 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.970
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164784
Transmission of revised asbestos sampling results for residential samples collected November-December 2001.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
18 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.969
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000145869
Interim final report from EPA Region 2 detailing a background study of environmental conditions at the World Trade Center site.
26 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.968
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗12 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.965
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 1.000 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178388
Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
Similarity score 0.975 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149537
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
Similarity score 0.973 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.970 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.968 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
Similar indexed content