NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 03/E-Mails Sent M. Gilsenan 2001-2002
Document / 4 pages

Draft screening levels for asbestos and silica in indoor air,

Machine-extracted title · confidence 50%

DEP memo forwarding EPA draft screening level calculations for asbestos, fiberglass, and silica in indoor air and settled dust for review.

NYC-WTC_000139634–000139637

Folder label: “E-Mails Sent M. Gilsenan 2001-2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000139634
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael

From: Gilsenan, Michael [DEPNET1/DEPGPO2/MichaelGi] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:04 PM To: 'Radhakrishnan, Krish'; Theodorellys, Penny' Cc: 'Avaltroni, Robert'; 'Chapin, Diana 001'; Sturcken, Charles Subject: FW: draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor air and settled dust

AsbScreenDrlApril. AsbCalcslAprll.xls wpd Krish- pls. comment on attached. I think we need to explain to Diana what this means to Asbestos in the greater scheme of things, assuming EPA makes these the standards.! don't know if EPA could establish standards(benchmarks) for WTC only.

---- Original Message---- From: DeVoney, Danielle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:48 PM To: DeVoney, Danielle; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Rodenbeck, Sven; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'Randi J. Walker'; 'Patricia M. Fritz' Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Cooper, Barbara; Lee, Carolyn V. (Virginia); Neurath, Sue; Wilder, Lynn Subject: RE: draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor air and settled dust

Hi

I ran some quick calculations for risk combining air and dust numbers, and integrated them into a screening level table. this assumes protecting for a 1/10,000 risk for one year for the upper tier, and the same for 30 years in the lower tier.

This is a first attempt on risk number, different exposure assumptions, and K values would yield slightly different results. I'm providing this as a basis for discussion. If we like the approach we can refine the risk calculations appropriately. Also, I've used a K factor of 1 x 10 -7 for "daily activity" although this works well with the math, we may want to refine that number also.

thanks, danielle

---- Original Message---- From: DeVoney, Danielle Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:58 AM To: '[email protected]'; grevatt.peterSepamail.epa.gov; [email protected]; Rodenbeck, Sven; [email protected] ;

1

NYC-WTC_000139634

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000139634Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →