NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Gilsenan, Michael
From: DeVoney, Danielle [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 01. 2002 1:48 PM
To: DeVoney, Danielle; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; Rodenbeck, Sven; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; 'Randi J. Walker'; 'Patricia M. Fritz'
Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; Cooper, Barbara; Lee, Carolyn V. (Virginia); Neurath, Sue;
Wilder, Lynn
Subject: RE: draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor air and settled dust
-----ts,
AsbScreenDrlAprll. AsbCalcslAprll.xls
wpd
Hi
I ran some quick calculations for risk combining air and dust numbers, and
integrated them into a screening level table. this assumes protecting for a
1/10,000 risk for one year for the upper tier, and the same for 30 years in
the lower tier.
This is a first attempt on risk number, different exposure assumptions, and
K values would yield slightly different results. I'm providing this as a
basis for discussion. If we like the approach we can refine the risk
calculations appropriately. Also, I've used a K factor of 1 x 10 -7 for
"daily activity" although this works well with the math, we may want to
refine that number also.
thanks,
danielle
---- Original Message----
From: DeVoney, Danielle
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:58 AM
To: '[email protected]'; grevatt.peter@epamail .epa.gov;
[email protected] ; Rodenbeck, Sven; [email protected];
[email protected]; DeVoney, Danielle;
laposta.dore@epamail .epa.gov; [email protected];
[email protected]; nj [email protected];
[email protected] ; [email protected]; Randi J.
Walker; Patricia M. Fritz
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor
air and settled dust
Importance: High
Hi
Main points of discussion on these issues for today's call are outlined
below. I've tried to identify the main technical issues, so we can reach
consensus, or identify additional information we need to consider on each
1
NYC-WTC_000163600
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.