NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
[email protected]; DeVoney, Danielle;
laposta.doreSepamail.epa.gov; david.ippolitoSosha.gov;
dan.craneSosha.gov; njefferyShealth.nyc.gov;
[email protected]; [email protected] ; Randi J.
Walker; Patricia W. Fritz
Cc: Callahan.Kathygepamail.epa.gov; Salkie.Richardgepamail.epa.gov;
Rotola.JoeSepamail.epa.gov
Subject: draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor
air and settled dust
Importance: High
Hi
Main points of discussion on these issues for today's call are outlined
below. I've tried to identify the main technical issues, so we can reach
consensus, or identify additional information we need to consider on each
point. I have included tiered screening values for fibrous glass which take
into consideration both dust and air levels. There are two versions of
these screening levels which take different approaches as outlined below. I
thought this would be useful for the discussion.
1) Sampling methodology for fibers. The microvac technique seems to be the
most well developed method. It is a written and approved ASTW method which
would give us surface loading information.
2) Use of K factors, or other techniques to extrapolate from settled dust
to air screening values.
Questions:
a) Does the group feel Willette's K factors are well enough
supported to apply in this case?
b) What other options exist? (see "Dust Ideas 1 April.wpd" below)
c) Can K factors be applied to non-fibrous dust components?
3) What risk estimate should be used for asbestos screening values?
A straight 1 year continuous exposure scenario gives a screening
values of 0.028 f/cc. However, if this is based on sampling during daily
activity, it may underestimate due to episodic higher exposures.
Earlier screening level for this tier was set at 0.01 f/cc.
One option would be to use non-aggressive air sampling in
conjunction with settled dust levels and modeling of activity based episodic
exposures for a combined risk assessment.
4) Sampling methodology and screening values for silica. We are still
working on determining a dust sampling method for silica. The sampling
method should be defined prior to determining a screening value for these
data.
2
NYC-WTC_000139635
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.