NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 03/E-Mails Sent M. Gilsenan 2001-2002
Document / 3 pages

EPA meetings and building industry coordination, March 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 50%

DEP correspondence regarding scheduling EPA meetings and coordinating with building industry groups on cleanup issues.

NYC-WTC_000139623–000139625

Folder label: “E-Mails Sent M. Gilsenan 2001-2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000139623
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Gilsenan, Michael [DEPNET1/DEPGPO2/MichaelGi] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:04 PM To: 'Chapin, Diana' Cc: 'Avaltroni, Robert'; Sturcken, Charles Subject: RE: EPA Task Force and Working Group meetings

Thanks for the information. Should Environmental Compliance make the meetings or would you prefer some other office setting them us? Also, should we wait until the Law Department and Legal vet out some of the issues they have raised? Thanks.

—Original Message— From: Chapin, Diana Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:00 PM To: 'Maldonado, Jane' Cc: Sturcken, Charles; Lanaghan, Mark; Avaltroni, Robert; Gilsenan, Michael; Kusterbeck, William Subject: RE: EPA Task Force and Working Group meetings

Charlie's Office and mine have contacts and phone numbers for REBNY, BOMA, ABO, Lower Manhattan, etc. (so does Betsy Coliins/Kusterbeck re water and sewer rates notices to interested owners). I doubt if there is much utility to OEM acting as a conduit to them since the agency talks to these groups much more frequently, unless it is a group we don't have knowledge of or a contact for in which case they could help.

-Original Message— From: Maldonado, Jane Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:56 PM To: Chapin, Diana Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Hoffer, Mark; Hoffer, Mark 001; Sturcken, Charles; Sturcken, Charles 001 Subject: EPA Task Force and Working Group meetings

I attended the NYC Task Force meeting on Wednesday, March 27 and the EPA Air Working Group meeting on Thursday, March 28. The following are highlights of both meetings.

At the NYC Task Force I reported that DEP had received approximately 50 referrals from the WTC hotline and 43 had been resolved. In all cases where an inspection was made, no visible debris/dust was observed where a sample could be taken. In addition, I stated that since Senator Clinton’s hearing, DEP responded to approximately 100 complaints via DEPHelp and, in 99 cases no visible debris or dust was observed. In the one case where DEP was able to take samples, the sample came back positive and DEP verbally requested a cleanup and the landlord complies. As I write this, DEP has received 58 referrals from the WTC Hotline; 46 have been resolved and 12 are in progress.

Parks released testing information and cleanup of said parks; only one park tested positive.

DCAS will be sharing with us, as well as EPA’s Indoor Air Working Group, the test results that they have on 20 City-owned buildings as well as 40 leased City buildings. They will add to their report the same fields as we have in our Private Owners testing results report so that City Task Force and EPA Working Group can use and plot the information as needed for their studies.

DEP’s Private Owners testing report was shared with DOITT’s contractor. Plan Graphics; DCAS’ Sylvia Price; and Dore LaPosta from EPA. Before releasing said information, Lai-Sun and Steven Levi from NYC Law gave the okay to share it among the groups. Law’s position was that health and safety should be the groups number 1

NYC-WTC_000139623

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000139623Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →