NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/Unboxed/Folder_0048
Document / 151 pages

DEP Environmental Protection Invoices, 1999-2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Archival folder label for Department of Environmental Protection invoices related to World Trade Center activities from 1999 to 2001.

NYC-WTC_000137749–000137899

Folder label: “Folder_0048

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000137885
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

FY2002 Rate Considerations • FY2001 Increase was 1% • Current financing documents indicate a 4% rate increase for FY2002; last year at this time FY2002 was projected at 5.4% • Because of DEP's large mandate driven capital program, future debt service requirements continues to push rates sharply higher in later years • The smaller the increase imposed this year, the larger the required increases in later years • The average annual rate. increase during this Administration has been 3.8%; the average during the prior administration was 12.5% and the average from 1986-1994 was 14.5%

• FY2001 YTD Revenues are on plan; the base forecast assumes that collection efficiency will increase 1%/yr FY02-FY04, and 0.5%/yr in FY05 and 06 • Collection efficiency improvements depend on OMB approval for DEP self funding an approximate $8 million Agency wide PS shortfall with OTPS funds currently in a sludge holding code • Additional new needs amounting to $27 million have been identified; a reasonable expectation is DEP will receive $22 million • The current baseline assumes 2.5%/yr inflation for collective bargaining

• Alternative assumptions: 2.5% or 3% on collective bargaining $22435 million in new needs - 1% collection improvement or no collection improvement

Recommendation • At least a 4% increase should be imposed • A 3% increase would provide less margin of safety and flexibility against potential financial risks related to: a higher CB settlement, possible shortfall in meeting collection efficiency target, unforseen costs (Croton) • A 5% increase would have to be explained as a departure from the published number. It does not significantly improve the out-year rate profile and its primary merit is to provide insurance against financial risks that are possible, but not all of which are probable. • DEP recommends a 4% increase. This is consistent with the current published projection and with the policy of maintaining the lowest rate possible while continuing a stable rate pattern in future years. It also helps keep pace with the 7% increase in cost of service while providing a reasonable draw down on the accumulated surplus

VC'd 6Z: TT TOOZ 8Z Js'W ZSS£-S6S-8Tz:XFd d3G NYC-WTC 000137885

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000137885Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000137900

Archival folder label for Department of Environmental Protection biweekly reports related to World Trade Center activities from 2000 to 2001.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

NYC-WTC_000149798 · Box DEP Box 10

Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →