NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 36/81 GREENWICH STREET Block: 19 Lot: 18: 7 BIN: 1000708 44 Trinity Place
Document / 5 pages

DEP response letter re: 44 Trinity Place debris, May 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Letter responding to DEP regarding debris accumulation at 44 Trinity Place following the WTC attacks.

NYC-WTC_000104740–000104744

Folder label: “81 GREENWICH STREET Block: 19 Lot: 18: 7 BIN: 1000708 44 Trinity Place

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000104740
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

L MA N AG EME N T

49/2 FIRST AVENUE NEW YORK,NY 10003 . FIELD OFFICE: 121 LASALLE STREET NEW YORE,NY 10027 TELEFI ONE:212-473.6339 a FACS.IMIL& 212-979-9027

May 13, 2002

NYC Department of Environmental Protection 59-17 Junction Blvd Flushing, NY 11373-5108 ,f, ' ATTENTION: Mr. R. Radhakrishnan '' Ur

Re: 81 Greenwich St. aka 44 Trinity Place

Sir:

I am in receipt of your letter, dated May 3, in which you state (1) that this office has not responded to your earlier communications, and (2) that an inspection of the exterior of the referenced building shows an accumulation of debris resulting from the attack on the World Trade Center. .

On March 5, 2002, you wrote to this office regarding standards for cleaning buildings after the attack. I responded in writing immediately (enclosed), and then called your office on three occasions. The third resulted in a discussion with Ms call

Theodorellys in which she made two points. They were: (1) EBW, LLC, the owner of the property had responded properly to the conditions at the building, and (2) the building had been inspected on March 5 and that an accumulation of dust had been observed on the store awning on the Greenwich Avenue side of the building. As my March 5 letter to you makes clear, shortly after the attack, EBW, LLC, the owner of the property, took steps to clean the building's public areas and exterior. The roof and all exterior walls were thoroughly washed by a vendor who specializes in such work.

After my discussion with Ms Theodorellys, I wrote to her (March 27, enclosed). That letter made several points, including thanking her for helping to schedule the reinspection of the building's exterior.

This office, in the person of Rafael Matos, next spoke to DEP on March 28, the next day, and was told by an inspector who identified himself as Carl that a reinspection was not required. Rafael stated, nonetheless, that the awning would be rewashed immediately — and it was. Upon receipt of your May 3 letter, we washed the awning yet again.

NYC-WTC 000104740

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000104740Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →