NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 52/81 GREENWICH STREET 1000798, 19/18
Document / 4 pages

DEP Correspondence Memo, 81 Greenwich Street, Nov 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Internal memo regarding drafting a response for processing related to environmental protection activities at the site.

NYC-WTC_000128366–000128369

Folder label: “81 GREENWICH STREET 1000798, 19/18

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000128368
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

a• * '

j f®

MANAG EME NTT

49½ FIRST AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10003 • FIELD OFFICE: 121 LASALLE STREET NEW YORK, NY 10027 TELEPh ONE. 212-473-6359 • FACSIMILE: 212-979-9027-

March 5, 2002 N `ri

Department of Environmental Protection '> `' 59— 17 Junction Boulevard _, v L1 — t'1 Corona, NY 11368-5107 ATTENTION: R. RADHAKRISHNAN >^ r~ 'cn Re: 44 Trinity Place, NY, NY C) rn

Sir: I have your letter of this date. It is inconsistent with the guidance provided by DEP to EBW,LLC, the owner of the referenced multiple dwelling, in the weeks following September 11. In those early days, I called DEP and other City and State agencies in order to solicit guidance regarding compromised environmental conditions and their possible remediation in residential buildings. I am concerned that your memo of March 5 is somewhat at odds with the information that I was given in those earlier communications. ~►r On September 14, 2001, a directive was issued bearing your signature. The subject was Cleanup of Asbestos-containing Material. In that directive, you differentiate between sites containing debris, and those that merely have an accumulation of dust resulting from the attack. In that second instance, the dust accumulation, you indicate the requirement to clean public areas, but not to test the dust for hazardous materials. Your March 5 memo implies otherwise: that all buildings should have been tested, including those that had dust, but not debris, resulting from the September 11 attacks. This office relied upon your written advice of September 14, and we expect you to stand by it — or to issue an explicit revision of your directive. Please let me know whether you are, in fact, revising that earlier directive. I attach herewith a list of steps taken to restore 44 Trinity Place between September 11, 2001 and now.

Yours Truly, RECEIVED //C OFFICE Q'= C0QPESPONDENCE AND CONSi-i T i~cNT S`e V',:;ES Ql fY Bernard McElhone for EBW,LLC - //jJzBY '

1 v -' M 262002

NYC-WTC 000128368

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000128368Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →