NYC-WTC_000093852
Brief explaining risks of sandblasting and chemical treatments on historic building materials.
Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.881
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Technical document describing characteristics, problems, and maintenance of glazed architectural terra-cotta.
NYC-WTC_000093838–000093851Folder label: “LANDMARK INFORMATION”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Preservation Brief 7: The Preservation of Historic Glazed Architectural Terra-Cotta Page 10 of 14
compounds or similar waterproof materials should never be undertaken because, like waterproof coatings, they impede Aworker cleans out mortar the normal outward migration of moisture through the Joints in preparation for masonry joints. Moisture then may build sufficient pressure repointing the architectural terra behind the waterproof caulk and the glaze on the terra-cotta cotta Photo: NPS flies. to cause damage to the unit itself.
Repair of glaze spalling: Glaze spalling is also a highly culpable source of water- related deterioration in glazed architectural terra-cotta. It is important to coat or seal these blistered areas and to prevent further entry of water into the system by this route. All loose or friable material should be removed. This may be done easily by hand; chisels or similar small tools are most effective. The exposed material is then painted over. At this time, no permanently effective reglazing materials are available. However, there are several acrylic-based proprietary products and masonry paints which can be used effectively to protect these exposed areas, thus preventing the entry of water. These materials are effective for 5 to 7 years and can be reapplied. They also can be tinted to approximate closely the original glaze color.
Repair of minor material spalling: Minor material spalling, where visual or cosmetic considerations are negligible, should be treated in a manner similar to glaze spalling damage. That is, areas where small portions of the body and glaze have spalled and which are far removed from close scrutiny (i.e., detailing on entablatures, upper story windows, etc.) are best remedied by painting with a masonry paint or an acrylic-based proprietary product. Units on which material spalling is easily observed (on the street level, door surrounds, etc.), and on which visual integrity is a consideration, may be better replaced. Patching is not appropriate. Stucco-like or cementitious buildups are difficult to form satisfactorily, safely and compatibly in situ to replace missing pieces of glazed architectural terra-cotta. Cementitious repairs never satisfactorily bond to the original material. The differential expansion coefficients of the two materials (the repair and the original) preclude a safe, effective and long-term attachment.
Repair of major spalling: Glazed architectural terra-cotta units, which have spalled severely thereby losing much of their material and structural integrity in the wall, should be replaced. Partial in situ repair will not be long lasting and may, in fact, cause complicated restoration problems at a later date. Appropriate methods of replacement are discussed at a later point in this report.
Temporary stabilization: Stabilization measures are necessary when deterioration is so severe as to create a situation where pieces of glazed architectural terra-cotta may fall from the building. This is a particular concern with greatly exposed detailing: cornices, balconies, balustrades, urns, columns, buttresses, etc. Restoration work on these pieces is expensive and often must be carried on over a period of time. Unstable terra-cotta pieces are often removed or destroyed in lieu of such measures. This is particularly true in areas of heavy traffic-related vibrations or in earthquake zones. There are, however, less severe measures which may be employed on a temporary basis. Substantial success has been achieved in securing unstable glazed architectural terra- cotta pieces with metal strapping and nylon net. While these measures should not be seen as permanent preservation solutions, they do offer temporary alternatives to the wanton destruction of significant glazed architectural terra-cotta detailing in the name of public safety and local code compliance.
Repair of addition and structural damage: Holes, sign anchors, slots for
EL channel steel, or structural cracking in the surface of glazed architectural terra-cotta cladding should be permanently sealed with a material that will expand with the normal dynamics of the surrounding material, yet effectively keep water out of the system. Any http://www2.cr.nps.gov/tps/briefs/briefD7.htm 10/3/2001
NYC-WTC 000093847
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000093852
Brief explaining risks of sandblasting and chemical treatments on historic building materials.
Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.881
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093728
Appendix B outlining performance standards and cleaning requirements for historic building exteriors.
Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.854
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000093788
Fax transmittal from the Mayor's Office regarding a March 2002 meeting with the building group.
Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.829
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164903
Forwarded programmatic agreement documentation addressing post-disaster building cleaning procedures and eligible building list for recovery efforts.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.845
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000125098
Protocol document outlining air sampling and monitoring procedures for 130 Cedar Street.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.827
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000152327
A financial document from late September 2001 related to water supply operations and emergency response costs.
1 shared topics · similarity 0.825
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000150931
Cover fax from the Mayor's Office forwarding DEP documents regarding exterior clean-up to be reviewed before a meeting with building owners.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.824
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000166488
Department of Buildings report containing findings and recommendations regarding the World Trade Center site.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.821
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153308
Draft advisory outlining required safety assessments and utility checks before allowing residents to return to buildings near the World Trade Center.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.818
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139257
DEP official requests final review of the latest air monitoring Scope of Work to conclude negotiations.
1 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.817
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000128425
Document excerpt describing compliance requirements for environmental remediation work at 94 Greenwich Street.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.816
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000111934
Document outlining regulatory compliance and follow-up visual assessments conducted by DEP at buildings near the World Trade Center.
Similar document embedding; no shared entity or topic indexed. · similarity 0.815
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.
Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000093580
Archival reference document with minimal visible content related to WTC-era landmark information.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000093581
Administrative record from the Landmark Information folder regarding the World Trade Center site.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000093582
Administrative record from the Landmark Information folder regarding the World Trade Center site.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000093583
Landmarks Preservation Commission notice withdrawing an application for alterations at 192 Broadway due to lack of landmark status.
Filed in the same folder
Permit for minor work issued by the Landmarks Preservation Commission for alterations at 55 Liberty Street.
Filed in the same folder