NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.5.1
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 28/GCMS X 1/11/02 A 1/31/02
Document / 20 pages

GCMS analysis results for sample AE00838, Feb 4 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Laboratory report showing GCMS analysis of sample AE00838 including surrogate recovery and unknown compounds.

NYC-WTC_000052167–000052186

Folder label: “GCMS X 1/11/02 A 1/31/02”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000052179
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Library Search Compound Report

Data File : C:\MSDCHEM\1\5973N\02JAN31\00838.D Vial: 2 Acq On : 31 Jan 2002 3:32 pm Operator: Sample : 508 scan Inst : Instrumen Mise : January 31, 2002 Multiplr: 1.00 MS Integration Params: LSCINT.P Quant Method : C:\MSDCHEM\1...\SCAN508.M (RTE Integrator) Title : 508 scan method Library : C:\DATABASE\WILEY7N.L ********************************************************************* Peak Number 7 1-Azetidinecarboxaldehyde, . Concentration Rank 8

R.T. EstConc Area Relative to ISTD R.T.

11.23 0.14 ug/L 74551 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 9.71

Hit# of 5 Tentative ID MW MolForm CAS# Qual

1 1-Azetidinecarboxaldehyde, 2,2,4... 141 C8H15NO 050455-46-4 46 do 2 2-methylpiperidine hydrochloride 135 C6H14C1N 005119-88-0 38 (939 3 l-acetyl-2-pipecoline 141 C8H15NO 004593-15-1 38 w(C 4 Azetidine, 1,1'-methylenebis[2-m... 154 C9H18N2 038455-30-0 37 Abundance Scan 688 (11.228 min): 00838.D (-) m/z 84.05 100.00% 84 /

5000 42 126 98 141 57 70 10.80 11.00 11.20 11.40 11.60 ................ ......................... m/z 42.10 39.83% 0 m/z~> 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

(h Abundance #37035:1 -Azetidinecarboxaldehyde, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl- $$... 84 126

5000 141 i 1 ■ ■ ■ i • • 57 98 10.80 11.00 11.20 11.40 11.60 108 m/z 126.10 37.35%

ol ■ i • ■ ■ • । > • • > । • i ' ' ' ' i ' ■ ■ 1 i ’ ■ i ■ ■ m/z--> 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Abundance #30102: 2-methylpiperidine hydrochloride 84

36 10.80 11.00 11.20 11.40 11,60 5000 56 m/z 44.10 23.96% 42

m/z-> 0+ Abundance 30 ........................ I 40 50 "Iil 60 70

70 80 90 100 110 #37067:1-acetyl-2-pipecoline 99

120 130 140 pka/wha 84 10.80 11.00 11.20 11.40 11.60 m/z 141.10 20.58%

5000 43

56 126 141 70 0 ....... I ' I ' ' ' ' I 1 ‘Iit I—pp ■ i ■ ' ' ' i 1 i ' ' 1 ■ i ■ ■ mfz~> 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 10.80 11.00 11.20 11.40 11.60

00838.D SCAN508.M Fri Feb 01 09:19:06 2002 Page 9

NYC-WTC_000052179

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000052179Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000003981

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000004494

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.997

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗
DEP GCMS data table, Jan-Feb 2002 · Box DEP Box 12

NYC-WTC_000004935

Multi-page laboratory data sheet containing sample analysis results and metadata for DEP GCMS records from January to February 2002.

1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.996

machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →