NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 80 pages

NYC-WTC_000233682

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000233682–000233761
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000233755
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

response guidelines

Isolate affected area if • Implement appropriate public • Characterize affected area. identified in the threat. health protection measures. • Revise public health protection

w Identify sites and initiate site characterization. • Plan for alternate water supply. • Analyze samples. measures as necessary. • Provide alternate water supply. ii Consult external information • Perform site characterization at • Plan remediation activities. sources. additional investigation sites. Gather information from law • Estimate spread of suspected enforcement assessment. contaminant. ii

Threats to contaminate the water made via direct notification by a perpetrator need to be taken seriously. However, the majority of such direct threats are hoaxes that may be intended to cause panic or disruption, gain attention, or fulfill a personal vendetta. Thus, the focus of the threat evaluation for this type of threat warning is to identify any credible threats amongst the larger number of hoax notifications. In any case, direct threats against the water supply should be reported to local law enforcement.

A key source of information that may support the threat evaluation under this scenario is provided directly by the perpetrator making the threat. In the case of a phone threat, it is important to collect information about the threat from the caller to support the threat evaluation. Similarly, a written notification should be carefully reviewed for details about the threat. Additional information collected throughout the investigation should be evaluated against the details of the threat notification, and it corroborates the details of the notification, then the threat is more likely to be deemed ‘credible.’

One of the potential challenges in managing a threat triggered by direct notification from a perpetrator is identification of an investigation site that will be the focus of site characterization activities. Unless a location is named in the threat, it will be necessary to use other information, such as that derived from vulnerability assessments or unusual water quality data/consumer complaints, to identify investigation sites.

73 Interim Final - August 2004

CITY_21MC100_0 04992412

NYC-WTC_000233755

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000233755Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000165900 · Box 7DDC

Document page containing contact details for Con Edison and JWC Environmental Health & Safety personnel.

Similar indexed content

NYC-WTC_000149798 · Box DEP Box 10

Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.

Similar indexed content

Compare copies and versions →