NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 16 pages

NYC-WTC_000229688

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000229688–000229703
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000229703
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

iz:JO^^M:NYc uaw ueoarxment :izi236i8765 # 2iz 55 JPN-22-2002 09:53 OS£P-UNIT RM. 7345 202 324 9235 P.17/43 TndustfialltygieneSurv^Federal Bureau of InvMtigaticn, Staten Island, NY

6.0 Recommendations

In light of the findings of this survey the following recommendations are made:

1. The only contaminant exposure of significance is asbestos. Approximately 40 % of the workers sampled were exposed at the PEL of 0.1 fZcc. Levels were always below 0.5 fZcc. 2. Agents working in the debris field at the conveyors, and searching cars should continue to wear the proscribed personal protective cquipmen includes a half-face respirator with N1OO cartridges, a Tyvek suit, gloves, hard hat ant 3. Continue to monitor asbestos exposure levels on agents working at the landfill. It is not necessary to monitor exposure each day. The current plan to test exposures once each week ♦ is more than adequate. 4, Continue to periodically monitor exposure to noise on agents working in the landfill while at the screeners. The current plan to test exposures once each week is more than adequate. 5. Additional exposure monitoring for VOC’s, respirable dust, silica, metals and lead should be discontinued.

13

NYC-WTC_000229703

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000229703Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →