NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000195866

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000195866
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000195866
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

USGS Spectroscopy Lab - World Trade Center USGS Lab XRD Studies Page 1 of 1

2 uses/JI science for a changing world --

http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov/wtc/Iab.studies.htnil

XRD

X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses of WTC samples (Table 1, on the Integration of Results page) indicate that most samples contain varying amounts of crystalline quartz, gypsum, calcite, and anhydrite. Other phases identified in small amounts are; muscovite, feldspar, magnesiohomblende, lizardite (non- asbestiform serpentine), dolomite, bassanite, illite, portlandite, larnite, polymorphs of calcium silicates, possible asbestiform chysotile, and others. The results are reported as major (>20% by weight), minor (>5% <20% by weight), and trace (<5% by weight). These ranges were determined by operator experience for the purpose of informing analysts and other interested parties of the relative concentrations of the phases present for the sample that was analysed.

All of the above mentioned phases can be components of the building dry wall material, the concrete foundation, and/or the insulation. Determining the presence of chrysotile at very small concentration levels by XRD is difficult due to the amount of other crystalline substances and the increased background due to large amounts or X-ray amorphous "rock wool" (fibreglass), which all of these samples contain. It was determined that small amounts of chrysotile (probably <0.5%) might be present in a few samples (see Table 1 on the Integration of Results page). The presence of chrysotile can sometimes be verified by other analytical methods but due to the heterogeneity of the samples, the splits that were made may not be representative, so results may vary. More work may be necessary to try to separate the chrysotile from the other material to determine if chrysotile is indeed present in any of the samples especially if it's presence can be verified by only one method.

For further information concerning XRD analyses, contact; Stephen J. Sutley U.S. Geological Surve 303-236-2444 [email protected]

I Speclab Home Pa^e i || [Speclab Contents/Index|

U.S. Geological Survey, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Interior This page URL= http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov/wtc/lab.xrd.html This page is maintained by: Roger Clark rclark@speclab. cr. usgs. gov Last modified Sept 25, 2001.

/i„k k+™i 1 n//i /nnm CITY_21MC100_004220118

NYC-WTC_000195866

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000195866Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →