NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Polly X-homas^- Re: Fwd: WTC dust study Pagein
From: Kelly McKinney
To: D'Andrea. Christopher; Jeffery, Nancy; Leighton, Jessica; Thomas, Polly; Tucker,
Andrew
Date: 12/23/02 6:21PM
Subject: R(3: Fwd: WTC dust study
Lioy published a detailed study of WTC dust in June with results that were generally consistent with what
we've seen. Weaknesses in his analysis in the past have been small sample size (n=3) and no indication
of background concentrations.
»> Andrew Tucker 12/23/02 06:00PM »>
Have you guys heard anything about the attached email/article from Environmental Science &
Technology?
************************************************
»> Summary;
> »> A new study of dust samples taken from around Manhattan in the days
> »> following Sept. 11.2001. could offer some much-needed good news to
> >» survivors of the World Trade Center attacks. A team of researchers tested
> >» debris from tfie collapsed towers for toxic organic chemicals and found
> »> that the potertial risk of exposure from inhaling such compounds was
> >lower
> >» than expected.
> »>
> »> Contact: Beverly Hassell
> »>
> »> 202-872-4065
> »>
> »> b hassell@a:s.orq
> »>
> »> FOR IMMED ATE RELEASE
> >»
> »> World Trade Center dust analysis offers good news for New Yorkers
> »>
> »> The rubble has been cleared from the World Trade Center site, but
> >» questions still loom about the long-term health effects on people who
> »> survived the terrorist attacks. A new study of dust samples taken from
> »> around Manhattan in the days following Sept. 11,2001, could offer some
> »> much-neede(J good news.
> »>
> »> A team of researchers tested debris from the collapsed towers for toxic
> >» organic chemicals and found that the potential risk of exposure from
> »> inhaling such compounds was lower than expected. The findings are
> »> scheduled to appear in the Feb. 1 print edition of Environmental Science
> >&
> »> Technology, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Chemical Society, the
> »> world's largest scientific society. The article was initially published
> >» Dec. 18 on the journal's Web site.
> »>
> »> The scientists were looking specifically for persistent organic
> >pollutants
> »> - highly stable compounds that pose a special problem because they endure
> »> in the environment and can be toxic to humans and wildlife. They found no
> »> evidence of tiigh levels of two particular POPs: pesticides and
> »> polychlorinated biphenyls, which were used in hundreds of industrial and
> »> commercial applications until their production was banned in 1977.
CITY_21MC100_009012090
NYC-WTC_000195367
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.