NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 1 page

NYC-WTC_000195367

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000195367
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000195367
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Polly X-homas^- Re: Fwd: WTC dust study Pagein

From: Kelly McKinney To: D'Andrea. Christopher; Jeffery, Nancy; Leighton, Jessica; Thomas, Polly; Tucker, Andrew Date: 12/23/02 6:21PM Subject: R(3: Fwd: WTC dust study

Lioy published a detailed study of WTC dust in June with results that were generally consistent with what we've seen. Weaknesses in his analysis in the past have been small sample size (n=3) and no indication of background concentrations.

»> Andrew Tucker 12/23/02 06:00PM »> Have you guys heard anything about the attached email/article from Environmental Science & Technology? ************************************************

»> Summary; > »> A new study of dust samples taken from around Manhattan in the days > »> following Sept. 11.2001. could offer some much-needed good news to > >» survivors of the World Trade Center attacks. A team of researchers tested > >» debris from tfie collapsed towers for toxic organic chemicals and found > »> that the potertial risk of exposure from inhaling such compounds was > >lower > >» than expected. > »> > »> Contact: Beverly Hassell > »> > »> 202-872-4065 > »> > »> b hassell@a:s.orq > »> > »> FOR IMMED ATE RELEASE > >» > »> World Trade Center dust analysis offers good news for New Yorkers > »> > »> The rubble has been cleared from the World Trade Center site, but > >» questions still loom about the long-term health effects on people who > »> survived the terrorist attacks. A new study of dust samples taken from > »> around Manhattan in the days following Sept. 11,2001, could offer some > »> much-neede(J good news. > »> > »> A team of researchers tested debris from the collapsed towers for toxic > >» organic chemicals and found that the potential risk of exposure from > »> inhaling such compounds was lower than expected. The findings are > »> scheduled to appear in the Feb. 1 print edition of Environmental Science > >& > »> Technology, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Chemical Society, the > »> world's largest scientific society. The article was initially published > >» Dec. 18 on the journal's Web site. > »> > »> The scientists were looking specifically for persistent organic > >pollutants > »> - highly stable compounds that pose a special problem because they endure > »> in the environment and can be toxic to humans and wildlife. They found no > »> evidence of tiigh levels of two particular POPs: pesticides and > »> polychlorinated biphenyls, which were used in hundreds of industrial and > »> commercial applications until their production was banned in 1977.

CITY_21MC100_009012090

NYC-WTC_000195367

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000195367Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →