NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 173 pages

NYC-WTC_000195194

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000195194–000195366
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000195301
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

WK'

wr apartment were recorded in the initial phase of the study, prior to cleaning. Six apartments were identified as having accumulated a significant amount of dust. The remaining seven apartments were identified as having a minimal amount of dust accumulation. All of the apartments characterized as containing a significant amount of dust presented windows that had been blown in during the collapse of the WTC. The visual observations were used in an attempt to distribute the cleaning methods evenly, based on the amount of dust present.

Once the analytical results were available, it was possible to quantitatively determine differences that existed in the amount of contamination that was present in the apartments prior to cleaning. As indicated above, the pre-cleaning results for asbestos wipe sampling, lead wipe and micro vacuum sampling, and MMVF wipe sampling results from the residential units provided the most w complete data set for determining the existing contamination in apartments prior to cleaning. These four data sets were used to establish differences in contamination between apartments prior to cleaning.

The results for each data set identified above were averaged by unit, then ranked from the highest concentration t the lowest concentration, which resulted in each unit having four rankings (one for each data set). These rankings are presented in Table 9.0.

The range of the highest concentration to the lowest concentration for each compound or sample type spanned an order of magnitude. One apartment, 4B, did not contain any porous surfaces that could be sampled, therefore there were no micro vacuum samples collected. This prohibited this unit from being included in the ranking.

Once the units were assigned a ranking for each data set, the rankings for each unit were summed to create a variable called "sum of ranks". This information is presented in Table 10.0. The sum of ranks has a theoretical range of 4-48, while the observed range in this evaluation was 13-45. This indicates that there was generally an even distribution within the theoretical range, with the 4 exception of the lower end of the range, as there were no units which ranked less than 13. Therefore, the visual observations of dust generally corresponded with levels of contamination found in the dust. The results of the ranking evaluation indicates that there was a difference in the 4 degree of an average contamination for these compounds between units prior to the cleaning 4 events. 4

w 4g

105

CITY_21MC100_011105335

NYC-WTC_000195301

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000195301Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →