NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 2 pages

PCM fiber results lab report, Aug 1998

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Laboratory report documenting PCM fiber analysis results for air samples collected in August 1998.

NYC-WTC_000186291–000186292
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000186292
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

( (

SctLabJob#; 98-08-7530 Client Name: Applied Technology Services, Inc. Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) Fiber Results K a A98113: Durings I a Flow Air Fiber Fibers SciLab Client Duratioii Filtered Reids Fibers Density Cone. TWA Sample # Sample # / Location CoUectod (liiers/min.) (rain.) (liters) (Fibers/mm ) (Fibers/cc)

II YK 0827987 II 0 0 0 100 0.5 0.64 5 Field Blank Footaoles: I 12 YK 0827987 12 0 0 0 100 0.5 0.64 Field Blank Footnotes: / Reporting Noles: (I) Fibers/cc cannot be calculated^ samdes (dTMMs) with no air volume. Analyzed by: Marvin BrotherZiP^ ‘ O \ - Da'® Analyzed: 8/28/98 Samples analyzed by NIOSH 740<)(A) MBTHOD^ESk #2,8/15/94; Limit of Detection = 5.5 fibers per 100 fields or 7 fibers / rnm2; This report relates ONLY to the sample analysis expressed / as fibers/iq nun of Olter area; ND = no Obeis observed; NA = Not Analjted; Walton - Beckett gradicule field area 0.00785 nun2; Duration in minutes; TWA = 8Hr TWA cilcularion assumes zero ezposute lor remainder of 8 hour period not sampled; Upper 95% Confidence Limit (Employer's Compliance Test) - Calculated as a one sided UCL to determine 95% certainty ol 3 compliance with the 0.01 fiber/oc standard; Esciaialed relative standard deviation: bitralab Sr « 0.270, lolerlab Sr= 0.450. ELAP #11480 0 U

r f (

Q t H r K I I—i

o s o o I o o co

o o on

NYC-WTC_0001 86292

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000186292Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →