NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 56 pages

WTC environmental investigation report, Sep 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.

NYC-WTC_000178388–000178443
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000178405
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Final Technical Report of the Public Health Investigation Page 18 of 56 or normal activity.

B. Samples Taken

Sample collection was conducted from November 4, 2001, to December 11, 2001, for the lower Manhattan area and from December 6-10, 2001, for the comparison buildings above 59th Street. Because of the limited and time critical essence of this investigation, thirty buildings in lower Manhattan were sampled, and four comparison buildings were sampled from the area north of 59th Street. In the 30 lower Manhattan buildings, the following locations were sampled: 59 residential units, 29 common areas, and 29 outdoor areas.

There were 127 air samples taken from 117 different areas of the lower Manhattan buildings. Ten of the areas had co-located sampling equipment. In the 59 different residential units, there were 64 air samples taken. Thirty air samples were taken from 29 different common areas.

Samples taken from the four comparison buildings above 59th Street included three outside air samples, three of common areas with both indoor settled surface dust and air, and five residential units with both indoor settled surface dust and air. No outside settled surface dust samples were collected because there was no visible dust to collect.

Tables 3, 4, and 5 show the number of buildings and areas within the buildings that were sampled for asbestos, SVF, and minerals in lower Manhattan and the comparison units above 59th Street. The tables also show whether the samples were settled surface dust and air samples.

C. Field and Laboratory Changes From the Original Sampling Protocol

Once the sampling teams went to the various sampling locations, it was determined that some changes needed to be made to the sampling protocol. The sections below indicate the changes that were made to the original sampling protocol.

1. Field Changes

The sampling protocol indicated that a total of 60 residential units would be tested in lower Manhattan. A total of 59 residential units were sampled.

Indoor settled surface dust was collected using EPA's Environmental Response Team Standard Operating Procedure (ERT SOP) for household dust, as stated in the sampling protocol. However, due to cost and equipment availability constraints. Omega Ultivac vacuums with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters were used instead of Nilfisk™ vacuums. To avoid the need to decontaminate the vacuum hose between each sampling event, a sample collection filter (Alsock, by Midwest Filtration) was inserted into the air-intake end of the vacuum hose. The Alsock has a 97% capture of particles with diameters of 1.1 microns and

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gOv/asbestos/lowermanhattan/ResSamp_Sep2002_Text.html 07/18/2003 NYC-WTC_000178405

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000178405Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

No available related records indexed in this group.

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →