NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 37 pages

Residential sampling protocol, World Trade Center, Oct 2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Sampling protocol developed to assess residential exposure to airborne and settled dust near the World Trade Center.

NYC-WTC_000178091–000178127
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000178093
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

jjMc residential plan octi 8.wpd PagT^

* * * *D724 FT* * * *

of pre- and post-cahbration flow rates will be used as the sample flow rate, for sample voliune I calculations. I Dust samples will be collected using the EPA Environmental Response Team (ERT) indoor dust sampling standard operating procedure (SOP). Duplicate samples are not feasible with indoor surface dust sample collection. Co-located samples (samples collected from adjacent areas of the floor) will be collected in 10% of the indoor surface dust sample locations. While not a true duplicate, evaluation of the results will provide some information on the variability of contaminants in the dust.

Chain of custody will be established and maintained throughout sample collection, transport, and analysis of the samples. Laboratory analysis shall follow all method-required quality assurance and quahty control procedures.

All samples collected, unless analyzed with destructive methods, will be archived until further notice.

Samples should not be packaged in untreated polystyrene-electrostatic forces may cause fiber loss from some sample filters.

I

3

CITY_2IMCl0 0_013 4 8 9 4 2 7 NYC-WTC_000178093

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000178093Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →