NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.2
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/Unboxed/No folder label
Document / 16 pages

Analytical laboratory reports attachment for PCDDs and PCDFs, 2008

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

Confidential attachment containing analytical laboratory reports regarding polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans under a protective order.

NYC-WTC_000175725–000175740
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000175732
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

BISosy’ ■I, Pace Analytical Services, Ine. 1700 Elm Street. Suite 200 weAnalyticar Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 www.pacelabs.coni REPORT OF: CHEMICAL ANALYSES Fax: 612.607.6444

PROJECT: PCDD/PCDF ANALYSES DATE: January 9, 2002

PAGE: 6 REPORT NO: 01-1052682

I Quality Control for PCDD/PCDF Analyses

The performance of the sample processing steps and the instrumentation are monitored on a routine basis: The procedures and criteria are summarized below.

One mimod blank and one laboratory spike sample are typically prepared with each ten samples of any ^iven matrix. Recoveries of the native PCDD/PCDF analytes in the laboratory spike samples ^ generally range from 70 to 130%. Recoveries of selected analytes outside this range do not invalidate the data but provide information, which is used by the laboratory to monitor recovery trends and to assure optimization of the method.

Internal standards are spiked into each sample prior to extraction in order to monitor the level of i recovery, which is achieved for each individual sample. Acceptable recoveries range from 40 to I 135 percent for the internal standards unless a deviation is due to variation in instrument response "" as a result of analytical interferences.

The resolution of the mass spectrometer is verified prior to each analysis to be 10,000 or greater. Hardcopies of the reference peaks are printed at the beginning and end of each analysis day. The resolving power of the DB-5MS chromatographic column is checked daily by analyzing a standard solution containing 2,3,7,8-TCDD and the adjacent TCDD isomers. The DB-225 column resolution is checked daily by analyzing a standard solution containing 2,3,7,8-TCDF and the adjacent TCDF <3 isomers. Acceptable performance is achieved when 2,3,7,8-TCDD or 2,3,7,8-TCDF is resolved y from the adjacent isomers by a valley of 25% or less. The group times for the selected-ion ­ monitoring data acquisitions are also checked daily by analyzing the column performance mix which has been modified to contain the first and last eluting isomers of each congener class. In Ji this way one is assured of collecting data representative of the total PCDD/PCDF content and that the 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers are suitably resolved.

y Initial calibrations are generated by analyzing standard solutions (see Table 4) containing target native and labeled PCDD/PCDF compounds. Response factors are calculated and averaged for g each compound. These averages are used for quantification and for comparison to the daily S continuing calibration. The relative standard deviation for each native compound must be 20% or less (30% or less for the labeled compounds) as specified in Method 8290. A continuing j calibration standard is analyzed at the beginning and end of each 12-hour shift on days when initial calibrations are not performed. The initial calibration is considered to be valid when the response factors from the continuing calibration analysis fall to within the ranges specified in Method 8290.

■ ?? REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.

iLLlElaO: CONFIDENTIAL, CITY_2IMCl00_003432699

SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER NO. 2, SEPT. 2008

NYC-WTC_000175732

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000175732Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →