2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.923
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Document / 1 page
Cleanup vs. abatement scope questions, April 2002
Machine-extracted title · confidence 80%DEP memo documenting questions about cleanup scope of work regarding enclosure requirements, decontamination areas, and ACM testing protocols.
NYC-WTC_000164482Page image
OCR text
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Av^tro’ni? Robert From: Gilsenan. Michael Sent: Tuesday, April 02. 2002 12:53 PM To: Chapin. Diana 001 Cc: Avaltroni. Robert; Sturcken. Charles 001; Radhakrishnan. Krish Subject: Exterior Cleanup-Jim Miller Questions
I just spoke to Jim and he had some questions regarding our scope of work. At first he was happy that our scope was for a cleanup and not an abatement, because we were not 1) requiring contractors to enclose the work area 2) not requiring decon. I informed him that we never require enclosure of outside areas because it's not feasible and that decon areas will be required as per our regs. I told him that our scope of work outlines the work to be preformed and our regs dictate the rules to follow. He then stated that this sounds like an abatement project to him and he is concerned about the publics perception. He is going to have DOH's consultant speak to Krish for further clarification. He also mentioned to me that OEM is checking with FEMA to see if they would pay for cleanups that were non ACM.
This led into a discussion on testing each and every bldg, and the delays associated with same . I'm not sure where he is going with this, however. I did state that a decision like this is not for me to make or him for that matter. My sense was that, after his consultants discussion with Krish. he would present his concerns (to whom I don't know). BEC will continue on the path as we've discussed unless I hear otherwise from you. Thanks
NYC-WTC_000164482
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000164482Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally
Related records
Browse subjects →Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
Same-box records
Filed elsewhere
NYC-WTC_000139639
DEP memo documenting discussion regarding questions about cleanup scope, contractor enclosure requirements, and public perception concerns.
3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.979
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139629
DEP memo documenting exterior cleanup scope coordination with EPA and state agencies on asbestos compliance rules and cleanup methodology.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.923
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160820
Correspondence between DEP staff and REBNY representatives confirming a meeting to discuss the exterior cleaning project schedule in early April 2002.
3 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.912
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164354
DEP correspondence scheduling interagency conference call regarding exterior cleanup scope, work separation, and legal liability concerns.
2 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.910
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164351
DEP correspondence to EPA and multiple city, state and federal agencies regarding WTC environmental response and remediation coordination.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.903
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000161162
Report summarizing findings on theft allegations at a residential site and discovery of human remains nearby.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.896
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000155813
Cover sheet for a confidential legal transmission sent to the US Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 concerning the 125 Cedar Street site.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.895
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139630
DEP memo regarding the finalization of a release form for building owners and scheduling meetings before cleanup work begins.
3 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.894
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000161533
EPA staff denies soliciting letters for the individual family grant program and clarifies their role in the cleanup efforts.
2 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.894
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000097083
Legal firm transmits confidential information regarding environmental work to EPA Region 2 via fax.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.894
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000152848
Internal DEP correspondence discussing scheduling of EPA meeting pending resolution of an NCP issue, with plans for follow-up conference call.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.893
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗More like this page
Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000160820
Correspondence between DEP staff and REBNY representatives confirming a meeting to discuss the exterior cleaning project schedule in early April 2002.
Similarity score 0.995 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139639
DEP memo documenting discussion regarding questions about cleanup scope, contractor enclosure requirements, and public perception concerns.
Similarity score 0.989 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160772
Discussion of contractors performing WTC facade cleanup using wet-soaking and power-washing protocols and potential water use restriction exemptions.
Similarity score 0.964 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139629
DEP memo documenting exterior cleanup scope coordination with EPA and state agencies on asbestos compliance rules and cleanup methodology.
Similarity score 0.962 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000160772
Discussion of contractors performing WTC facade cleanup using wet-soaking and power-washing protocols and potential water use restriction exemptions.
Similarity score 0.954 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.953 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Others also read
Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000139639
DEP memo documenting discussion regarding questions about cleanup scope, contractor enclosure requirements, and public perception concerns.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000139629
DEP memo documenting exterior cleanup scope coordination with EPA and state agencies on asbestos compliance rules and cleanup methodology.
Similar indexed content
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000160820
Correspondence between DEP staff and REBNY representatives confirming a meeting to discuss the exterior cleaning project schedule in early April 2002.
Similar indexed content
NYC-WTC_000164354
DEP correspondence scheduling interagency conference call regarding exterior cleanup scope, work separation, and legal liability concerns.
Similar indexed content