NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 44/No folder label
Document / 7 pages

Draft screening levels asbestos, fiberglass, silica, Apr 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

Correspondence discussing draft EPA screening levels for asbestos and silica in indoor air and settled dust during post-WTC response.

NYC-WTC_000164455–000164461
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000164455
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Maldonado, Jane From: Avaltroni, Robert Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3;29 AM To: Maldonado, Jane 001 Subject: FW: draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor air and settled dust

From: Gilsenan, Michael Sent; Monday, April 01, 2002 3;04 PM To; Radhakrishnan, Krish; Theodorellys, Penny Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Chapin, Diana 001; Sturcken, Charles 001 Subject; FW; draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor air and settled dust

Krish- pls. comment on attached. I think we need to explain to Diana what this means to Asbestos in the greater scheme of things, assuming EPA makes these the standards.! don’t know if EPA could establish standards(benchmarks) for WTC only. —Original Message— From: DeVoney, Danielle fmailto:[email protected] Sent; Monday, April 01, 2002 1;48 PM To; DeVoney, Danielle; '[email protected] ’; ‘[email protected] ’; '[email protected] ’; Rodenbeck, Sven; ‘[email protected] ’; '[email protected] ’; '[email protected] ’; '[email protected]’; '[email protected] ’; '[email protected]’; '[email protected] ’; '[email protected]’; 'Randi J. Walker; 'Patricia M. Fritz’ Cc; '[email protected] ’; '[email protected] ’; '[email protected] ’; Cooper, Barbara; Lee, Carolyn V. (Virginia); Neurath, Sue; Wilder, Lynn Subject; RE; draft screening levels for asbestos, FG and silica in indoor air and settled dust

Hi- I ran some quick calculations for risk combining air and dust numbers, and integrated them into a screening level table, this assumes protecting for a 1/10, SEE risk for one year for the upper tier. and the same for 30 years in the lower tier. This is a first attempt on risk number, different exposure assumptions, and K values would yield slightly different results. I’m providing this as a basis for discussion. If we like the approach we can refine the risk calculations appropriately. Also, I’ve used a K factor of 1 x 10 -7 for “daily activity” - although this works well with the math, we may want to refine that number also. thanks, danielle

•Original Message—

NYC-WTC_000164455

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000164455Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →