NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails M. Gilsenan 2002
Document / 6 pages

Air monitoring audit schedule notification, July 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

DEP notification of air monitoring audit schedule changes with assigned personnel for WTC-related environmental monitoring activities.

NYC-WTC_000163858–000163863

Folder label: “E-mails M. Gilsenan 2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000163861
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Schiano, Frank Sent: Tuesday, July 02,2002 4:40 PM To: Gilsenan, Michael Subject: FW: indoor cleaning - comments on form

—Original Message---- From: Hoffer, Mark Sent: July 1, 2002 15:51 To: Schiano, Frank Subject: FW: indoor cleaning - comments on form

fyi —Original Message— From: Kahn, Lawrence rmallto:[email protected] <mailto:fmailto:[email protected]> Sent: IFriday, June 28,2002 9:57 AM To: ‘[email protected]’ Cc: ICushman, Steven Subject: indoor cleaning - comments on form

Here are a few comments on EPA's draft of the Request Form for the Indoor Air Program: Steve and I both found the two choices put to the tenant/owners on page 1 to be somewhat confusing. Except for the distinction drawn between the “aggressive” and “modifed aggressive” air sampling on the last page, there is little explanation of what air sampling consists of, and there is no explanation at all of what “monitoring” is. It’s unclear whether this form will be distributed together with another document that will explain the program, but if not, the program and these terms should be explained in the Request Form. If there is a separate document explaining the program and these terms, the other document should be referenced in the Form in a way that makes it clear that the tenant/owner understands what it is he/she is consenting to. Also, if the tenant/owner requests “monitoring of the Residence” (second of the first two choices on page 1), I suppose what’s intended is that the tenant/owner will decide whether he/she wants to request dust cleaning after seeing the results of the monitoring. The second choice should probably say, therefore: “I request monitoring of the Residence. 1 will wait until 1 see the results of the monitoring before deciding whether to request dust cleaning of the Residence.” The purpose of the air sampling should be made clear. (For comparison, see the first of the two choices on page 1 - monitoring afterwards will be to confirm that asbestos is not present above cleanup levels.) Unless all monitoring/sampling/cleaning will happen on a single day, the form should specify the length of time for which consent to access the residence is given (see last para., page 1), or at least make clear that the tenant/owner understands the various steps entailed and that it will take a number of days to complete the various processes. Page 2,3'^ paragraph, 2'«’ line - change “and fragile objects” to “and fragile and valuable objects”. Everything else in the Form seems ok. The proposed addendum to the contract, responding to EPA’s request for changes to the contract, also seems ok. Please call if you’d like to discuss.

1

NYC-WTC_000163861

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000163861Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →