NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Giisenan, Michael
From: Atteloney, Leonard
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Lutchmedial, Carlstien
Cc: Theodorellys, Penny; Radhakrishnan, Krish; Giisenan, Michael
Subject: RE: Air Results review
Based on your review I will return the "Final Visual Inspection of Abatement Projects" reports to Warren and
Panzer that were unacceptable.
Those that were found to be acceptable will be processed for payment. I will keep them on file in the laboratory
or if you choose I will return them to you.
Thanks for your assistance.
Leonard
—Original Message—
From: Lutchmedial, Carlstien
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Atteloney, Leonard
Cc: Radhakrishnan, Krish; Theodorellys, Penny
Subject: Air Results review
The results submitted are mostly completed. However, some of the buildings are partially finished. That is, facades
may be remaining to be cleaned.
One of the problems I observed in the report was the use of Yes & No in the check off page.
The line says “Visual Inspection checklist (No residual Dust or Debris Observed - Yes or No)
However, I noticed that “No” has been indicated on numerous final inspections. A no would mean that the location has
debris. Therefore, it could not pass inspection. Also, some of the technicians checked off everything, regardless of
what was done. Thus, its not clear where the work took place. I have returned forwarded the package to you with the
okay set and the problem set separated.
1
NYC-WTC_000163511
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.