NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
71,592
Front Office
Microvacuum
1
743,552
Blank
Microvacuum
2
803
ND= asbestos not detected
The interpretation of these results is constrained by the scientific
uncertainty regarding the potential for the measured concentrations in
settled dust to become airborne. There are no standards currently
available
for assessing potential health consequences from asbestos through the
evaluation of wipe or microvacuum samples. A scientific peer review
panel
(World Trade Center October 21- 22, 2002 Peer Review Meeting Notes.
Available at www.tera.org.) recently evaluated the technical soundness
of
estimating airborne asbestos concentration as a function of asbestos
concentration in settled dust for the purpose of setting health-based
benchmarks. The panel recommended against such an approach based on
the
significant uncertainty associated with the numerous factors (such as
activity patterns, sample location, surface characteristics, air
exchange
rates and room volume) that influence this relationship. EPA's use of
surface wipe and microvacuum sampling at its WTC Residential
Confirmation
Cleaning Study site (110 Liberty St) was intended to provide a measure
of
cleaning effectiveness, and not a risk-based health assessment.
Risk from asbestos is directly related to its concentration in air.
Consequently, post-cleaning aggressive (i.e., use of a leaf blower and
fans)
air sampling was conducted at 114 Liberty St. by DEP's contractors to
insure
that asbestos levels in air met risk-based clearance criteria.
The EMSL analytical report does not provide detailed information on
sample
collection, however, it appears many samples were collected from
inaccessible areas below the hardwood flooring, or from areas of
unknown
accessibility such as wall tracking, pipe shafts and I-beams. The
scope of
work developed for the clean up activities was designed for the removal
of
5
NYC-WTC_000163178
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.