NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan
Document / 4 pages

Memo regarding WTC Dust Cleaning Program change order, Feb 2003

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Internal memo requesting cost estimates for mailing letters to participants in the WTC Dust Cleaning Program.

NYC-WTC_000162932–000162935

Folder label: “E-mails 2003 M. Gilsenan”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162934
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Theodorellys, Penny Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 2:05 PM To: Gilsenan, Michael Cc: Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: The numbers you requested

1073 inspected

222 DEP Cleanup 217 DEP Cleanup Completed 3 pending and in progress (weather holding up progress) 2 license agreements have not been sent received

100 Cleaned by Owner after DEP identified some debris present 2 Cleaning by Owner was ongoing and inspected but DEP has not confirmed “entire” cleaning performed (again weather)

We received 336 total replies from building owners. There were two basic time frames when results were received and they were coded differently in the column of received, (ie. for Previous, Yes, Yes P for results received at two separate intervals). A mailing accompanied the original group of inspections, as we expanded the zones, we hand delivered the copies. Also we had assistance from Paul, Bob, and Rose’s groups in this outreach. We have copies of our letters in our files, but we don’t have a count.

1

NYC-WTC_000162934

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162934Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →