NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Gilsenan, Michael
From: Erdfarb, Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Resnick, Risa
Cc: Schiano, Frank; Fenves, Carol; Nudelman, Harold; Gilsenan, Michael (ex); Avaltroni, Robert;
Smyth, Virginia; Kelpin, Gerry
Subject: RE: EMIPA's protest?
you should speak to Mark and Frank and draft a response that says that there is no appeal of a denial of protest. His
remedy is in the courts. Further, we could have dismissed the inital protest because it was late and misdirected, but chose
to respond because that was the "right" thing to do.
—Original Message—
From: Resnick, Risa
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Erdfarb, Stuart; Fenves, Carol: Nudelman, Harold
Cc: Schiano, Frank
Subject: EMIPA's protest?
I read through the 2nd appeal of the denial of the protest on 1081-AQMS. What should we do about this? His
argument is that the first denial and appeal upholding was "partial" b/c they were waiting for FOIL documents and he
therefore argues that this is timely. Aside from the obvious silliness of this argument, do we again need to address
each allegation or is an overall "you already had your bite at the apple" sufficient. Harold, if you haven't seen this. I'll
send a copy to you.
Risa A. Resnick, Esq.
Assistant Counsel
New York City Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Legal Affairs
59-17 Junction Blvd., 19th Floor
Flushing, New York 11373
718-595-6606
[email protected]
1
NYC-WTC_000162280
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.