NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 2 pages

EMIPA protest appeal response memo, May 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

Internal memo advising on how to respond to an EMIPA protest regarding a denial of a previous appeal.

NYC-WTC_000162280–000162281

Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162280
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Gilsenan, Michael From: Erdfarb, Stuart Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:28 AM To: Resnick, Risa Cc: Schiano, Frank; Fenves, Carol; Nudelman, Harold; Gilsenan, Michael (ex); Avaltroni, Robert; Smyth, Virginia; Kelpin, Gerry Subject: RE: EMIPA's protest?

you should speak to Mark and Frank and draft a response that says that there is no appeal of a denial of protest. His remedy is in the courts. Further, we could have dismissed the inital protest because it was late and misdirected, but chose to respond because that was the "right" thing to do.

—Original Message— From: Resnick, Risa Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:06 PM To: Erdfarb, Stuart; Fenves, Carol: Nudelman, Harold Cc: Schiano, Frank Subject: EMIPA's protest?

I read through the 2nd appeal of the denial of the protest on 1081-AQMS. What should we do about this? His argument is that the first denial and appeal upholding was "partial" b/c they were waiting for FOIL documents and he therefore argues that this is timely. Aside from the obvious silliness of this argument, do we again need to address each allegation or is an overall "you already had your bite at the apple" sufficient. Harold, if you haven't seen this. I'll send a copy to you.

Risa A. Resnick, Esq. Assistant Counsel New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Legal Affairs 59-17 Junction Blvd., 19th Floor Flushing, New York 11373 718-595-6606 [email protected]

1

NYC-WTC_000162280

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162280Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →