NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
clqaners' and the assurance that the dust was largely safe. Baptist and
health department officials said.
Many volunteers labored in paper masks considered
inadequate for work
with asbestos. Some had respirators that tightly sealed over the nose
and mouth and purified air using a high-efficiency filter, but they were
used sporadically or not at all, volunteers and Baptist officials said.
"I wore mine the first hour or so, but then it got too hot
and kind of
hard to talk," said Donald Kimbell, a 51-year-old retired police officer
from Ruston, La. "Most folks that were in there didn't wear 'em."
Meanwhile, day laborers _ as many as 5,000 by some
estimates cleaned
dust from downtown apartments for as long as 10 weeks running, said Dr.
Steven Markowitz, director of the Queens College Center for the Biology
of Natural Systems.
Most workers said employers did not provide respirators.
said
Markowitz, who operated a mobile exam room for workers near ground zero.
Some workers said they brought their own respirators but were prevented
from using them, he said.
"The employers would tell them not to use the respirators
because it
would alarm the other workers," Markowitz said.
One Polish-born worker said respirators were used
inconsistently in
buildings around ground zero.
"Some people wear it, some people not, nobody checking,"
said the
worker, a certified asbestos handler who asked to remain anonymous for
fear of angering potential employers. "You should be wearing it in every
room. Nobody tells us how much asbestos inside."
Despite such reports, federal and city agencies issued only
one
citation for improper cleaning. Respirators, and other safety gear and
procedures, are required under federal regulations governing work with
asbestos-containing material; asbestos abatement can cost three to four
times more than a standard cleaning job.
The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
which is
charged with ensuring worker safety, selected 34 buildings around the
trade center site in January for random inspection after receiving
complaints about dangerous work conditions.
The first inspections did not occur until up to 10 weeks
after many day
laborers stopped working _ and as late as last month about a half-dozen
buildings had yet to be inspected.
OSHA gave employers advance notice of the inspections,
which officials
said is standard practice. No asbestos violations were found.
Under city regulations. New York’s Department of
Environmental
Protection is required to ensure that asbestos workers, their clothing
and equipment are decontaminated so asbestos fibers do not escape from
work sites.
Union officials repeatedly told the department that
non-union laborers
weren't using proper gear or procedures, said Sal Speziale, president of
Laborers Local 78, which represents 3,200 hazardous-materials workers.
Speziale claims that inspectors did little to crack down on
violations .
"It seemed like they didn't do nothing to rectify the
situation," he
said.
Thirty-seven asbestos projects were registered with the
department in
4
NYC-WTC_000162191
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.