NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
errwno....
up material that’s more than 1 percent asbestos. As Leighton said that recommendation applied only to
much as 35 percent of the dust may have contained buildings where landlords had not detected enough
that much, but labor groups charge that enforcement asbestos to require professional cleaning.
of the rules was lax, and federal officials acknowl But that qualification wasn’t mentioned on many
edge that it was a low priority. health department press releases and fliers posted on
Now, after months of saying that indoor cleaning downtown buildings. And the distinction was lost on
was landlords’ and residents’ responsibility, federal many residents, who cleaned heavy dust deposits in
and local agencies have reversed course. The Envi buildings that hadn’t been tested, said Madelyn Wils,
ronmental Protection Agency and city Environ chairwoman of lower Manhattan’s community board.
mental Protection Department announced May 8 •r“At the,time when people were starting to get back
they will spend federal funds to professionally clean inrto their homes, it was unclear,” she said. “There
the apartment of any resident who requests it. was no leadership from the city, state or federal gov-
ernment on this.”
Asbestos on pipes Artist Nancy Manter said she is recovering from
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, pneumonia she developed after cleaning inches of
which owns the trade center, was about halfway dust from her apartment two blocks from Ground
through a multi-million-dollar asbestos-removal
Zero.
project when the twin towers were attacked. Both “Cancer, of course, is a huge concern,” she said.
towers had asbestos fireproofing on heating pipes, in “You feel like you’re not being told the truth.”
terior spaces and the support columns behind their Volunteers at risk
distinctive metal cladding. Port Authority spokes
man Allen Morrison said.
Around Thanksgiving, more than 1,000 Southern
Public agencies have tested thousands of dust sam Baptist volunteers cleaned apartments around Bat-
ples taken in lower Manhattan since Sept 11, tery Park City through a program that sends volun-
Up to 35 percent of the samples tested by the EPA teers to disaster areas.
had enough asbestos fibers to require professional The city Office of Emergency Management coordi
cleaning and the use of respirators. Tests conducted nated their efforts and the health department pro
for the city found those levels of asbestos in only 6 vided volunteers with high-efficiency vacuum clean
ers and the assurance that the dust was largely safe,
percent of the samples. Baptist and health department officials said.
As recently as last month, private and public tests Many volunteers labored in paper masks consid
still detected asbestos in some lower Manhattan ered inadequate for work with asbestos. Some had
buildings. respirators that tightly sealed over the nose and
Tests by a New York University team also found mouth and purified air using a high-efficiency filter,
minimal levels of chromium, dioxin, lead, nickel and bat they were used sporadically or not at all, volun
polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.
. ■rhe U.S. Geological Survey found that the dust teers and Baptist officials said.
could be caustic when mixed with water, apparently “I wore mine the first hour or so, but then it got too
because of a substance in concrete. And tests con hot and kind of hard to talk,” said Donald Kimbell, a
ducted for the city health department found fiber 51-year-old retired police officer from Ruston, La.
glass, a possible carcinogen, in nearly half of the “Most folks that were in there didn’t wear 'em.”
samples. Meanwhile, day laborers — as many as 5,000 by
some estimates — cleaned dust from downtown
Risks downplayed? apartments for as long as 10 weeks running, said Dr.
iabor groups, environmentalists and downtown Steven Markowitz, director of the Queens College
residents say that federal and local agencies down Center for the Biology of Natural Systems. .
played potential risks posed by the dust, leaving resi Most workers said employers did not provide res
dents confused. pirators, said Markowitz, who operated a mobile
On Sept. 13, the EPA issued a statement that said: exam room for workers near Ground Zero. Some
“Sampling of bulk materials and dust found gener workers said they brought their own respirators but
ally low levels of asbestos ... the general public were prevented from using them, he said.
should be very reassured by initial sampling.” “The employers would tell them not to use the res
But EPA officials say they also warned residents pirators because it would alarm the other workers,”
and cleaning companies that they should presume Markowitz said.
the dust had asbestos levels high enough to require One Polish-bom worker said respirators were used
professional contractors with respirators to clean up inconsistently in buildings around Ground Zero.
heavy deposits. “Some people wear it, some people not, nobody
“We knew that there was asbestos in the dust and checking,” said the worker, a certified asbestos han
the recommendation was to use professional dler who asked to remain anonymous for fear of an
abatement contractors,” agency spokeswoman gering potential employers. “You should be wearing
Bonnie Bellow said. it in every room. Nobody tells us how much asbestos
“I never heard EPA say that,” said Jessica Leigh inside,”
ton, assistant commissioner of the New York City
Department of Health. “It was not the assumption
we’re working under.”
Instead, the city health department said as early as
Sept. 17 that residents could clean their own apart
ments using wet rags, mops and high-efficiency vac
uum cleaners.
Pa(^ao/^3
NYC-WTC_000143021
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.