NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
find local agencies downplayed potential risks posed by the dust, leaving
residents confused.
On Sept. 13, the EPA issued a statement that said:
"Sampling of bulk
materials and dust found generally low levels of asbestos ... the
general public should be very reassured by initial sampling."
But EPA officials say they also warned residents and
cleaning companies
that they should presume the dust had asbestos levels high enough to
require professional contractors with respirators to clean up heavy
deposits.
"We knew that there was asbestos in the dust and the
recommendation was
to use professional abatement contractors," agency spokeswoman Bonnie
Bellow said.
"I never heard EPA say that," said Jessica Leighton,
assistant
commissioner of the New York City Department of Health. "It was not the
assumption we're working under."
Instead, the city health department said as early as Sept.
17 that
residents could clean their own apartments using wet rags, mops and
high-efficiency vacuum cleaners.
Leighton said that recommendation applied only to buildings
where
landlords had not detected enough asbestos to require professional
cleaning.
But that qualification wasn't mentioned on many health
department press
releases and fliers posted on downtown buildings. And the distinction
was lost on many residents, who cleaned heavy dust deposits in buildings
that hadn't been tested, said Madelyn Wils, chairwoman of lower
Manhattan's community board.
"At the time when people were starting to get back into
their homes, it
was unclear," she said. "There was no leadership from the city, state or
federal government on this."
Artist Nancy Manter said she is recovering from pneumonia
she developed
after cleaning inches of dust from her apartment two blocks from ground
zero.
"Cancer, of course, is a huge concern," she said. "You feel
like you're
not being told the truth."
Around Thanksgiving, more than 1,000 Southern Baptist
volunteers
cleaned apartments around Battery Park City through a program that sends
volunteers to disaster areas.
The city Office of Emergency Management coordinated their
efforts and
the health department provided volunteers with high-efficiency vacuum
cleaners and the assurance that the dust was largely safe. Baptist and
health department officials said.
Many volunteers labored in paper masks considered
inadequate for work
with asbestos. Some had respirators that tightly sealed over the nose
and mouth and purified air using a high-efficiency filter, but they were
used sporadically or not at all, volunteers and Baptist officials said.
"I wore mine the first hour or so, but then it got too hot
and kind of
hard to talk," said Donald Kin±)ell, a 51-year-old retired police officer
from Ruston, La. "Most folks that were in there didn't wear 'em."
Meanwhile, day laborers _ as many as 5,000 by some
estimates cleaned
dust from downtown apartments for as long as 10 weeks running, said Dr.
Steven Markowitz, director of the Queens College Center for the Biology
3
NYC-WTC_000162184
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.