NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 43/E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan
Document / 6 pages

AP news article regarding WTC forwarded, May 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 70%

EPA news article forwarded to DEP staff for informational purposes regarding WTC-related environmental matters.

NYC-WTC_000162188–000162193

Folder label: “E-mails 2002 M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000162189
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

^AP Photbg NY322-326 of May 13< ^By’MICHAEL WEISSENSTEIN= "'and= -'MALCOLM RITTER= -'Associated Press Writers= NEW YORK (AP) _ From Latin American day laborers to Southern Baptist volunteers, hundreds of people cleaned potentially hazardous dust from buildings around the World Trade Center site without standard safety gear. The cleanup continued for months after Sept. 11 as public agencies issued confusing and often reassuring assessments of risks posed by the dust, according to public documents and dozens of interviews. Asbestos, glass particles and caustic powder settled unevenly in scores of apartment and office buildings when the twin towers collapsed and sent dust clouds rolling through lower Manhattan, public and private tests show. But while some public officials said it should be assumed the dust contained asbestos and required professional cleaning, others said it could be safely removed with wet rags, mops and vacuum cleaners. In the weeks and months that followed, air-filtering respirators were used sporadically or not at all by many volunteers, immigrant laborers and residents who cleaned up the dust. More than 400 laborers have reported dizziness, coughing and other maladies months after stopping work, according to a medical team's study of their health problems, the most extensive such survey to date. Some scientists say the workers also face an elevated, if still relatively low, risk of asbestos-related cancer in coming decades. Any such illness, they say, would have been entirely preventable. "It's a public health outrage they were allowed to be exposed in this way," said Dr. Stephen Levin, medical director of the Irving J. Selikoff Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Local and federal rules require elaborate safety procedures and respirators for workers cleaning up material that's more than 1 percent asbestos. As much as 35 percent of the dust may have contained that much, but labor groups charge that enforcement of the rules was lax, and federal officials acknowledge that it was a low priority. Now, after months of saying that indoor cleaning was landlords' and residents' responsibility, federal and local agencies have reversed course. The Environmental Protection Agency and city Environmental Protection Department announced May 8 they will spend federal funds to professionally clean the apartment of any resident who requests it.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which owns the trade center, was about halfway through a multimillion-dollar asbestos-removal project when the twin towers were attacked. Both towers had asbestos fireproofing on heating pipes, interior spaces and the support columns behind their distinctive metal cladding. Port Authority spokesman Allen Morrison said. Public agencies have tested thousands of dust samples taken in lower Manhattan since Sept. 11. Up to 35 percent of the samples tested by the EPA had enough asbestos fibers to require professional cleaning and the use of respirators. Tests conducted for the city found those levels of asbestos in only 6 2

NYC-WTC_000162189

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000162189Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →