NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.3.3
☕ Buy me a coffee
← Document results/DEP Box 42/E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002
Document / 1 page

Building owner contacts for exterior cleanup program, Sep 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

List of building owners and managers willing to discuss the exterior cleanup program following WTC attacks.

NYC-WTC_000161450

Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002”

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000161450
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Rphgrt From: Radhakrishnan, Krish Sent: Monday, September 23,2002 3:37 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Gilsenan, Michael Subject: Exterior Clean up Program

Based on the discussions we had the other day, I am providing additional information.

Number of buildings inspected 1072 (This does not include multiple inspections conducted on a building)

Ours staff had contacted the following building owners / managers who are willing to talk about our exterior clean up program. Please contact them.

Richard Rubel of Cedar Management (212) 732-7653 (We cleaned a number of their buildings (123 Fulton, 121 Fulton, 116 Fulton, 25 Malden Lane). 25 Maiden Lane is active now.)

Guy Plush (212)285-4232 We cleaned a number of their buildings as well. I don't have a list of the addresses though.

St. Peter's Church -16 Barclay Street Mr. Williams Celli PH L_______________________________ J

75 Murray Street Mr. April (212)766-2711

If you need additional information, please let me know. Thanks

Krish, (718)595-3718

NYC-WTC_000161450

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000161450Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →