Correspondence discussing whether to postpone or proceed with an invitation for bids based on vendor interest.
NYC-WTC_000161125–000161126Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002”
OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
>
Pursuant to the Pre-Bid conference call yesterday, we would like to submit our comments. Unfortunately, many call centers that have the experience and capability to provide the services that you require, such as us, are precluded from responding primarily because of the time factor that you have imposed. You have not provided sufficient time for a proper response. You do not have all the information readily available that is necessary for a call center to review and implement before starting service. It was unfair to impose such requirements realizing that recipients would be precluded from submitting a bid. We have the latest in sophisticated computerized equipment; we have 35 years of experience; our rates are very competitive; our service is excellent. Having received your RFB during the day on Thursday (5/16), reviewing it on Friday (5/17), then being off for the weekend (5/18 & 5/20), then having a mandatory conference call on Monday (5/20), and then being required to mail a Bid no later than Wednesday (5/22), and then start service no later than Saturday (6/1) and all without complete information from your agency is something, that in our opinion, would not attract companies that are conservative and precise in establishing a new account, programming it, training its staff, testing call types, and then becoming fully operational. Perhaps you will receive a Bid from at least one of the conference callers but then it may not be in the interest of all parties concerned if that company is awarded the Bid simply by default because others, like us, did not have sufficient time nor information to prepare for it.. Please be advise that we will not submit a Bid based on all the above. Thank you for considering us. Phil Kenter Relay Communications Center, Inc. Riverhead, L.I., New York 1-800-248-8330 ext 315
NYC-WTC_000161126
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000161122
Forwarded emails discussing an EPA lawyer's broad criticism of the planned interior apartment cleaning program.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.968
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138481
DEP staff discussion regarding whether to postpone the WTC-CALL bid deadline, with recommendations based on expected bid quality.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162278
Internal coordination regarding deadline for WTC call center services bid submission.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162268
DEP staff correspondence regarding whether to postpone a WTC-CALL competitive bid deadline, with bid submissions due May 23, 2002.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.994
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138483
DEP correspondence discussing the decision to postpone or maintain the May 23, 2002 bid deadline for WTC-CALL service contract.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.993
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138474
DEP staff correspondence regarding contract review, including questions about EPA insurance naming and contractor indemnification requirements.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.973
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162274
Correspondence from a contractor regarding insufficient time provided for responding to an invitation for bid for WTC services.
1 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.972
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138477
DEP correspondence regarding the WTC-CALL service bid invitation deadline of May 23, 2002, including vendor concerns about timeline and bidding process.
1 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.946
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162270
Contractor complaint regarding insufficient time and information to respond to WTC-CALL invitation for bid with May 23 deadline.
1 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.946
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138485
DEP response clarifying that the WTC-CALL contract is solicited under emergency provisions with limited contractor participation and abbreviated bidding timelines.
1 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.946
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138479
DEP correspondence addressing WTC-CALL bid deadline and a vendor's request for extension due to insufficient preparation time.
1 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.945
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162272
Correspondence between DEP staff discussing a contractor's request to extend the bid deadline for the WTC-CALL project.
1 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.945
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
NYC-WTC_000147617
Document outlining requirements for a vendor to provide live operator services answering calls about residential cleaning and testing south of Canal Street.
Similarity score 0.999 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138481
DEP staff discussion regarding whether to postpone the WTC-CALL bid deadline, with recommendations based on expected bid quality.
Similarity score 0.996 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162268
DEP staff correspondence regarding whether to postpone a WTC-CALL competitive bid deadline, with bid submissions due May 23, 2002.
Similarity score 0.996 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000162278
Internal coordination regarding deadline for WTC call center services bid submission.
Similarity score 0.996 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000138483
DEP correspondence discussing the decision to postpone or maintain the May 23, 2002 bid deadline for WTC-CALL service contract.
Similarity score 0.995 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000161122
Forwarded emails discussing an EPA lawyer's broad criticism of the planned interior apartment cleaning program.
Similarity score 0.977 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000160529
Notice instructing staff to preserve original World Trade Center documents as potential legal evidence and not dispose of them.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000160530
DEP memo documenting inconsistent dust control from WTC debris transport trucks affecting school reopening plans.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000160536
DEP memo discussing WTC recovery contractor operations, fuel requirements, infrastructure repairs, and school proximity.
Filed in the same folder
NYC-WTC_000160537
Forwarded draft press release from NYC Department of Health regarding WTC environmental and health guidance.
Filed in the same folder
Distribution of the final version of a Department of Health press release concerning WTC indoor air quality.
Filed in the same folder