NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 42/E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002
Document / 10 pages

WTC cleanup exemption notice draft discussion, March 29 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 85%

DEP discussion of drafting water use exemption notice for contractors performing necessary WTC hazard remediation and facade cleanup work.

NYC-WTC_000160788–000160797

Folder label: “E-mails R. Avaltroni 2002

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000160788
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

iiiiisiiiai From: Chapin, Diana Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:43 PM To: Gilsenan, Michael; Collins, Betsy: Greeley, Douglas Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Sturcken, Charles; Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: RE: Facade Cleanup

Any work that is necessary for hazard remediation or WTC should be exempt, but we should have a notice for them to post. Someone should draft something up that we could issue to contractors or owners?

—Original Message From: Glisenan, Michael Sent: Friday, March 29,20021:11 PM To: Chapin, Diana 001 Cc: Avaltroni, Robert; Sturcken, Charles 001; Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: Facade Cleanup

A couple of contractors doing facade cleanup for building owners have called Asbestos regarding their concern that they might be subject to drought fines for the work they are performing (wet soaking and power washing at low volume are part of the cleanup protocol).

Asbestos has a list of owners who have reported a cleanup underway or about to begin. Is this information something Betsy Collins or Doug Greeley might need to know? I guess I have two questions 1) Is this an issue for the drought emergency and 2) If it is, under the circumstances do we need to look at it differently. Thanks for your help.

NYC-WTC_000160788

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000160788Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →