> DOH and that they would like to review our scope of work regarding the
> exterior cleanup before our pre-bid conference on April 3. 1 informed Jim
> that there is nothing in our scope of work that deviates from our Asbestos
> rules (Title 15 Chapter 1). I advised Jim that EPA and State DOH should
> look at our Asbestos rules so that they can better understand how the work
> would be conducted. Jim indicates that EPA and State DOH feel that an
> argument could be made that by cleaning up outside it somehow translates
> to cleaning up inside. Jim is looking to have the cleanup be less
> obtrusive to the public. I told him that I don't know how that can be
> accomplished without ail interested parties meeting. Jim indicated that
> he would ask OEM to convene a meeting with EPA, State DOL, State DOH, NYC
> DOH, OSHA and ourselves before April 3.
>
>
NYC-WTC_000160780
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000160780Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally
Correspondence regarding finalizing release forms and letters required before DEP meetings with building owners to commence exterior work in early April 2002.
6 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.981
Correspondence between EPA and DEP officials discussing scheduling meetings with building owners to address exterior cleanup issues in late March 2002.
7 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.979