NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 42/E-MAILS SENT R. AVALTRONI
Document / 2 pages

E-MAILS SENT R. AVALTRONI

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000160030–000160031
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000160030
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Avaltroni, Robert From: Avaltroni, Robert Sent: Friday, December 06,2002 2:44 PM To: Radhakrishnan, Krish Subject: FW: Residential Cleaning and Testing Program - Cancellation Polic y

C.DTF

---- Original Message---- From: Callahan.Kathy@epamail .epa.gov [mailto:Callahan.Kathygepamail .epa.gov] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 2:02 PM To: Robert Avaltroni (E-mail) Cc: Callahan.Kathy@epamail•epa.gov Subject: FW: Residential Cleaning and Testing Program - Cancellation Polic y

bob, we did change the cancellation policy to make it more stringent. we have distributed it to the contractors . we did not change it to make it applicable "since inception of the program". to do so would require additional detailed follow up, for example, tracking down the situations where this had occurred and contacting the contractors and residents who might be involved, perhaps even calling people who had been rescheduled and telling them that we had a more stringent policy and now they were no longer eligible. this has potential for adverse public reaction (we never told the public they would be eliminated from the program until the new policy) as well as consuming resources on a now small universe of residents, we never discussed a retroactive application, either between us, or the day we met with fema. if you have thoughts on this, i would appreciate your sharing them with me. i did not get back to brad gair because, given the issues we have been dealing with in the last week, i felt this one did not warrant top priority, we did, timely, change the policy. it is the retroactive part that i have a concern with, but let me know what you think. if you agree with me that retroactive application is not appropriate, perhaps you can tell brad gair. call if you have questions. thanks. kathy Kathleen C. Callahan 212-637-3116 212-637-3115 (fax)

Bob,

As you will recall, I raised the Cancellation Policy issue at our meeting with EPA a few weeks ago. I sent Kathy Callahan the email (below) for follow-up, but I have not received a response. Can you confirm for me that we have now formally adopted a Cancellation Policy that provides for efficiently dropping applicants who do are not home for or cancel their 1

NYC-WTC_000160030

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000160030Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →