NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
By December 2001, we had all our estimates ready for reconstruction to Admiral
fasurance Company, which insured the building. We required the full policy lumt of
$7.5 million to properly rehabilitate the building, fa May 2002, we received a paltry $1.4
million from Admiral. What were we supposed to do? What work were we supposed to
begin when we did not know how much money tte insurance company would provide
us? What would you do?
We decided to forge ahead and do as much work as we could, but things got worse. Once
it began to be tetter known that the environment was grossly polluted on 9/11, we
commissioned an environmental report from Ambient Company, who have been actively
involved in 90 Church St. and other locations throughout the site, fa July 2002, the
report noted horrendous amounts of contamination. This required new estimates because
now we are considered a toxic site with special rules in place for remediation. Our new
estimates went way beyond our policy limits of $7.5 million. With 9 families in the
building, and 15-20 young children, we cannot take any chances in leaving any toxic
materials in the building.
Admiral Insurance finally came up with new estimates in early January 2003. fa the
interim, we kept working on the building by repairing the front and back facades, and
initiating window replacements. We now have about 60% of the policy money.
Normally, any company would allocate money for a rebuilding project and work from a
defined budget Because of Admiral’s lack of cooperation with us, we have been unable
to do that and we have been working in a piecemeal fashion.
The DEP will work with us and we have had several meetings with them. However, they
will not begin work until die fecades were completed and aH windows were replaced.
Therefore, we had to move forward on the window replacement project., which will be
completed by the end of February. Only then, in the beginning of March will the DEP
begin their cleaning of the building. They have estimated that it will take until about
mid-May to complete the demolition and cleaning. We wiU then be left with a gutted
building that will take, according to our architect’s estimates, at least to the end of2003
to be in livable condition.
This is how we currently stand. There is a great deal of misinformation on the part of
FEMA. Susan Jhun of NYl News has spoken with FEMA who says that the DEP told
them that the cleanup will be done in March and then we can move back in. That is
completely and totally inaccurate. Furthermore, FEMA told her that anything to be
done after the PEP cleanup is unrelated to 9/11. That is also completely inacenrate.
With the rental assistance program ending on March 10, there is a group of families in
114 Liberty St. who will be in dire financial straits having to pay rent and mortgage every
month. We are imploring FEMA to extend the rental assistance program for this small
group of families until we are truly and safely able to return to our homes. We have bear
NYC-WTC_000159777
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.