NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 31/125 CEDAR 1 OF 2
Document / 5 pages

Memo on media strategy for 125 Cedar Street, Dec 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 90%

Memo advising against a camera crew at 125 Cedar Street due to tenant issues and recommending print media.

NYC-WTC_000156088–000156092

Folder label: “125 CEDAR 1 OF 2

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000156092
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document i NOU-12-2002 i6:-48.’" FROM US EPA R^SlON 2 ORC TO 317185954544 P.05/05 1

fe I

Fibrous glass - We reviewed approximately 120 PCM results reported as fibrous glass analysis. The highest detected concentration was 0.009 f/cc, which is below the numeric criteria of 0.01 f/cc in the COPC document. Thus, for fibrous glass', the data we reviewed indicates that fibrous glass is not a hazard at 125 Cedar Street.

Mercury - We reviewed 66 wipe results which were analyzed for mercury. Seventeen samples were below the detection limit of 0.000478 /xg/'n? and the highest detected concentration was 0.0164 The COPC document does not establish a numeric criteria for mercury, however since USEPA is I collecting 250 wipe samples for mcrcuiy' as part of residential cleanup program a numeric criteria is I currently being developed. Tlie draft value, which is subject to revision based upon further evaluation of I exposure parameters, is currently 94 gg/h?. Comparison of the mercury concentrations detected to the draft numeric criteria of 94 gg/m” indicates that mercury is three orders of magnitude below the draft numeric criteria. Thus, for mercury, the'data we reviewed indicates that mercuiy is not a hazard at 125 ! Cedar Street. ~4.«v

I Silica - We reviewed the data for 19 air'samples which were analyzed for silica (i.e., total quartz). All of , the samples were below the detection limit of 10 gg. The numeric criterion that USEPA has proposed in the COPC document is 1 gg/n?. Although the COPC document has chosen the value of 1 gg/m‘’, the I available methodology for collecting indoor air samples for silica cannot achieve a value this low, therefore a result that is below the detection limit is considered to be protective of public health. This is the same approach we are u.sing at 110 Liberty Street, where the detection limit was 4 gg. Thus, for silica, the data we reviewed indicates that silica is not a hazard at 125 Cedar Street.

<

I

I f

I I f I I I I I * !

I I J TOTAL P.05 I k NYC-WTC_000156092

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000156092Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →