NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
18
would had consumed much more time than cleaning large flat surfaces like floors and walls. The
contractors also may have violated the sampling protocols themselves (not using-aggressive
sampling, and/or not pulling the specified volume of air during sampling) so as to bias the
laboratory test results.
It also appears that EPA does not want the trouble and added expense that would be entailed by
additional abatements at 114 Liberty, even to the extent of misrepresenting test results in its
reports and statements to FEMA. This was done even to the extent of knowingly exposing
residents at 114 Liberty Street to silica, a human carcinogen, at levels higher than EPA’s
criterion and the NIOSH benchmark as well. This was also done at the expense of dismissing
resident testing of dusts for asbestos which proved that visible dust accumulations were still
present, and at higher asbestos concentrations than background.
EPA has also been misrepresenting the health effects of silica in all its WTC-related documents,
concealing the fact that it is a federally recognized human carcinogen, and that it causes chronic
conditions similar to those being reported as “WTC cough.”
Sincerely,
Cate Jenkins, Ph.D.”
Environmental Scientist,
Waste Identification Branch
Hazardous Waste Identification Division
Mail Code 5304 W
[email protected]
cc: Board of Directors, 114 Liberty St. Condominiums
NYC-WTC_0001 54993
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.