Department of
EnvironrrSBI^ EXCERPTS - FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Protection
59-17 Junction Boulevard
Flushing, New York
11373-5108
I
Christopher O. residential cleanup effort represents a significant undertaking by EPA, FEMA, and
Comm ss oner York City. Nonetheless, it has been criticized by some groups. The geographical
coverage of the cleanup, which was limited to residences in Lower Manhattan south of
Canal Street, has beeil questioned. The procedures employed in the testing and cleanup
have been criticized, particularly the fact that EPA has not required all apartments within
a building to be cleaned, thus risking re-contamination of already cleaned apartments. In
addition, not requiring the cleaning of all HVAC systems was criticized as a limitation
that could lead to re-contamination of clean apartments. On February 10, 2003, U.S.
Congressman Jerrold Nadler pointed out additional concerns with the indoor cleanup,
noting that some dowytown buildings had not been properly cleaned and that EPA’s plan
should also include cleaning and testing in workplaces.
DRAFT EXCERPTS - FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
20
(718) DEP-HELP
NYC-WTC_000153517
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
NYC-WTC_000153517Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally
Letter responding to correspondence regarding the EPA World Trade Center Cleanup Program, noting that extensions through December 28, 2002, were sufficient for registration.