NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 11/WTC DC TO RC LETTERS CALLEHAN WHITMAN ETC. WARD DOCTOROFF KENNY
Document / 1 page

EPA letter clarifying asbestos position, Mar 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

EPA Region 2 Administrator clarifies agency position on asbestos sampling and distinguishes an employee's personal views from official policy.

NYC-WTC_000151634

Folder label: “WTC DC TO RC LETTERS CALLEHAN WHITMAN ETC. WARD DOCTOROFF KENNY

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000151634
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON. O.C. 20460

mar _ 6 2002

OFFICE OF Tliomas R. Frieden, MD., M.P.H. SOLID WASTE AND EMEHCENCV RESPONSE Commissioner New York City Department of Health 125 Worth Street New York, NY 10013

Dsar Dr. Frieden:

Thank you for your letter of February 14,2002, to Governor Whitman, Administrator of the U.S. Environment^ Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) regarding Ms. Cate Jenkins, to which the Governor has asked me to reply. You asked for clarification of the Agency’s position with respect to asbestos, following your receipt of a letter from Ms. Jenkins, an Agency employee, which offered her opinion with respect to the sampling and analysis taking place in and around the World Trade Center site.

Your department and any other person or organization should consider Ms. Jenkins’ views on this matter as those of any private citizen, and not those of an official Agency re presentative. As she stated in her letter, her opinions are her own and do not reflect the official S(;ientific or policy views of the EPA. Under her official duties, she holds no responsibilities re lated to the response work being carried out at the site. She does not represent EPA’s position o:i asbestos analytic methods, risk assessment approaches, or response methods. For the record, EPA disagrees with the asbestos risk assessment approach this employee proposed, and believes it does not reflect the scientific consensus on characterizing the health effects of asbestos.

I appreciate your kind words regarding EPA’s support to New York City. EPA has been ci»ordin«ting closely with New York City, New York State, and other Federal agencies to ensure consistent use of the latest proven state-of-the-art analytical methods, to evaluate data from multiple agencies on a daily basis, and to protect potentially exposed individuals. I agree that we have had a successful, collaborative approach among the various Federal, state and local agencies involved. This has been a difficult situation for all concerned, and I apologize foz the confusion c- iused by this employee’s letter.

I hope this clarifies the Agency’s position. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely, c. Marianne Lamont Horinko Assistant Administrator

fS Printed on Recvcied Paoer zoo@ BH punjjadns - Vda -S’n ZTT8 £09 COZ XVd C0:CT IIRL ZO/ZO/CO

NYC-WTC_000151634

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000151634Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →