NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 10/ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM
Document / 59 pages

ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000149683–000149741
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000149716
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Delays in obtaining equipment resulted in only 10 buildings being sampled for the PM2.5 air flection. There was no visible settled surface dust around the comparison homes selected above 59th Street; therefore, no outdoor settled surface dust samples were collected from the comparison areas above 59th Street.

2. Sample Analysis Changes

Airborne and settled surface dust samples were analyzed for crystalline silica using EMSL Analytical’s Material Science Division Operating Procedure MSD 0700, January 2000. XRD analysis was conducted for the nonsilica crystalline minerals in air and settled surface dust samples by EMSL using Material Science Division Operating Procedure MSD 9300, January 2002. The samples were not ashed prior to XRD analysis for the following reasons; ashing samples could have resulted in loss or breakdown of analytes of interest including gypsum; and there was not enough organic material present to result in loss of method sensitivity for crystalline minerals of interest.

SEM analysis was conducted on air samples for fibrous glass and other synthetic vitreous fibers by EMSL using Material Science Division Operating Procedure MSD 0300. This analysis was conducted on all samples collected from the comparison areas above 59th Street and on only those air samples from lower Manhattan with PCM fiber concentrations higher than the comparison PCM fiber concentrations.

Settled surface dust samples were analyzed for fibrous glass by EMSL using New York State Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Approval Program Method 198.1 polarized-light microscopy methods for identifying and quantifying asbestos in bulk samples.

Settled surface dust samples were not weighed, so surface loading of materials could not be calculated. Although settled surface dust samples were sieved, sieving was not conducted as specified in the ERT SOP. Rather, sieving was conducted as specified in MSD 0700 and 9300.

D. Data Management and Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures

EPA provided the laboratory used for this investigation. The laboratory is part of EPA’s “certified” Contract Laboratory Program. It used all of the EPA quality assurance/quality control laboratory methodologies when analyzing the samples collected for this investigation. EPA conducts audits of all the EPA-certified laboratories to assure that appropriate quality assurance/quality control laboratory methodologies are being used.

Chain-of-custody procedures were established and maintained throughout sample collection, transportation, and analysis of samples. These procedures helped to assure that analytical results could be matched to the sampling locations.

15

NYC-WTC_000149716

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000149716Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →