NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Delays in obtaining equipment resulted in only 10 buildings being sampled for the PM2.5
air flection.
There was no visible settled surface dust around the comparison homes selected above
59th Street; therefore, no outdoor settled surface dust samples were collected from the
comparison areas above 59th Street.
2. Sample Analysis Changes
Airborne and settled surface dust samples were analyzed for crystalline silica using EMSL
Analytical’s Material Science Division Operating Procedure MSD 0700, January 2000.
XRD analysis was conducted for the nonsilica crystalline minerals in air and settled
surface dust samples by EMSL using Material Science Division Operating Procedure MSD
9300, January 2002. The samples were not ashed prior to XRD analysis for the following
reasons; ashing samples could have resulted in loss or breakdown of analytes of interest
including gypsum; and there was not enough organic material present to result in loss of
method sensitivity for crystalline minerals of interest.
SEM analysis was conducted on air samples for fibrous glass and other synthetic vitreous
fibers by EMSL using Material Science Division Operating Procedure MSD 0300. This
analysis was conducted on all samples collected from the comparison areas above 59th
Street and on only those air samples from lower Manhattan with PCM fiber concentrations
higher than the comparison PCM fiber concentrations.
Settled surface dust samples were analyzed for fibrous glass by EMSL using New York
State Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Approval Program Method 198.1
polarized-light microscopy methods for identifying and quantifying asbestos in bulk
samples.
Settled surface dust samples were not weighed, so surface loading of materials could not
be calculated. Although settled surface dust samples were sieved, sieving was not
conducted as specified in the ERT SOP. Rather, sieving was conducted as specified in
MSD 0700 and 9300.
D. Data Management and Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
EPA provided the laboratory used for this investigation. The laboratory is part of EPA’s
“certified” Contract Laboratory Program. It used all of the EPA quality assurance/quality
control laboratory methodologies when analyzing the samples collected for this
investigation. EPA conducts audits of all the EPA-certified laboratories to assure that
appropriate quality assurance/quality control laboratory methodologies are being used.
Chain-of-custody procedures were established and maintained throughout sample
collection, transportation, and analysis of samples. These procedures helped to assure that
analytical results could be matched to the sampling locations.
15
NYC-WTC_000149716
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.