NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 10/ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM
Document / 59 pages

ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM

Label derived from the City's folder field. The City does not supply document titles.NYC-WTC_000149683–000149741
Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000149713
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

In general, air monitoring near the WTC has not detected any pollutants from the fire and building collapses at levels that are of public health concern. Within the restricted zone (within one block of the WTC), low levels of asbestos have been found in the airborne dust from the building collapse (7). Bulk dust and air samples (mostly on or near the work site), as well as surface runoff water, river sediment, and river water have been analyzed for other contaminants, including metals, VOCs, PAHs, dioxins and PCBs. These contaminants were found at low levels that did not indicate a need to conduct further sampling for them at the time of the residential sampling (8).

D. Community Exposure

The most likely routes of community exposures to contaminants would be through breathing in airborne dust and through direct contact with surface dust and debris. The sampling plan was developed to determine the potential for exposure to building material-related contaminants in air and dust.

E. Human Health Effects of Concern

The primary health effects of immediate concern are respiratory effects and irritant effects from inhalation of or direct contact with building-related materials. Many of the materials expected to be in airborne dust can cause eye, nose, and throat irritation. In addition, those materials that can be inhaled or respired from airborne dust can cause respiratory irritation and exacerbation of pre-existing problems such as asthma, emphysema, and cardiopulmonary disease. Materials in the surface dust can cause skin irritation on contact. There have been reports of burning throat and eyes from residents returning to the area.

OBJECTIVES

The overall objective of this sampling was to provide results upon which public health agencies could further determine the potential for environmental exposures to WTC collapse-related materials and possible health implications of the exposures. Sampling was intended to better characterize ambient and indoor airborne and potentially airborne particles (surface dust) in residential areas of lower Manhattan from the collapse of WTC.

Specifically, the objective was to characterize the makeup and size distribution of airborne breathing zone dust in residential areas—both indoors and outside—near the WTC. This information was used to further determine whether materials were present in air at levels of public health concern and whether settled surface dust contained materials that could potentially be re-entrained and result in continued exposures.

Note: The sampling approach was focused on contaminants that emanated from the collapse of the WTC towers and that might cause health problems. However, this investigation could not conclude if contaminants or materials found actually came from the disaster. The contaminants that were selected for testing could be present in some areas from other sources. Some typical examples of this include cooking on a stove top, which can increase indoor airborne particulate matter; vehicle exhaust.

12

NYC-WTC_000149713

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000149713Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →