NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
NYC-WTC_000149537–000149682Folder label: “ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
V All analyses were done on a volunteer basis and will be available as public documents. We report today on the data from Oct. 2 through Oct. 31, 2001. Airborne particles and human health In general, there are myriad ways that materials released into the air can affect human health. What the particles are made of matters; so do size, shape and quantity. The DELTA team analyzed the samples for the unique chemical and physical signatures of dozens of substances, including elements from concrete and glass, such as silicon; from burning fuel oil, such as sulfur, vanLdium and nickel; and from burning computers and electrical systems, such as lead. They also looked for organic, or carbon-based, compounds from burning wood, plastic and carpets. And they tested for glass shards and asbestos. Some of these materials are known to cause health problems in some people when they are inhaled in sufficient amounts. Sulfur, for example, can irritate lung tissues. Lead can damage the central nervous system. Some carbon-based compounds can cause cancer. So can the mineral asbestos. Just as the composition of inhaled particles can affect health, so can size. The team analyzed the particles by size in eight ranges from coarse (12 micrometers to 5 micrometers in diameter) to very fine (0.24 micrometers to 0.09 micrometers in diameter). Most of the uitrafine mode (particles less than 0.1 micrometers) was not collected. Coarse particles are typically filtered by the nose or coughed out of the throat and upper lungs. They can irritate the mucous membranes, causing coughs and nosebleeds. In some individuals, they can cause allergic reactions such as dry eyes; nose, throat and skin irritation; coughing, sneezing and respiratory distress. They can also cause breathing problems or aggravate pre existing breathing problems, such as asthma. However, very fine particles can travel deep into human lungs. Such small particles may have no immediate apparent health effects in moderate concentrations, but they typically are removed from the lungs through the bloodstream and heart, increasing the possibility of health impacts. There are no established safe limits for inhaled very fine particles. The closest reference is the U.S. EPA “PM2.5” standard, which limits the allowable mass of airborne particles in the size range 2.5 micrometers to 0 micrometers. That standard is based on health studies of typical air samples, in which very fine particles are a small fraction of the total mass. In contrast, in the World Trade Center samples analyzed at UC Davis, the very fine particles are a large fraction of the total mass. In a news conference today, the DELTA researchers described key findings in these categories: very fine particles, coarse particles, metals, asbestos and glass. Very fine particles There were numerous events when bursts of wind lasting six to eight hours carried unprecedented amounts of very fine particles to the sampling site. In the largest spike, the DELTA Group analysis found 58 micrograrr.s per cubic meter of very fine particles in one 45-minute period—“an extremely high peak,” Cahill said. Cahill said the very fine particles contained high levels of suffur and sulfur-based compounds, which in early analyses appear to have been ** .. .nated by sulfuric acid. The very fine particles also contain high levels of very fine silicon, potentially from the thousands of tons of glass in the debris. Cahill noted that even those large amounts were likely to be smaller than those present at Ground Zero and some other parts of Lower Manhattan, since weather data show that typically only part of the dust clouds traveled directly over the sampling site.
NYC-WTC_000149567
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149798
Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗41 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
25 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164784
Transmission of revised asbestos sampling results for residential samples collected November-December 2001.
24 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.986
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153220
Draft protocol outlining objectives and locations for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas.
16 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153258
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
17 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000159829
Coordination memo for WTC recovery inter-agency meeting on building and parks assessment and scope.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.999 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.982 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000151997
Memo from Mayor's office environmental coordinator regarding air quality findings and federal EPA response to WTC fallout, February 2002.
Similarity score 0.980 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.979 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.971 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000144741
Standard administrative notice requiring the retention of original World Trade Center records as evidence for future legal actions.
Similarity score 0.969 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000164671
Draft document titled World Trade Center Emergency Safety and Health Plan dated September 30, 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000152439
Letter from Con Edison to DEP regarding follow-up on water pumped from a gas main during the World Trade Center recovery.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000123875
Letter from environmental consultants summarizing ambient air sampling and cleanup activities at 225 Rector Place.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer