NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Instructions and sections for collecting sample location data from a specific building interior.
NYC-WTC_000149537–000149682Folder label: “ATSDR/DHAC_ASTM”

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext
NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
General Notes on Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures are used to ensure the precision, accuracy, completeness, representativeness, comparability, and method detection limit of the results. The co located samples and blanks are a primary means of assessing each of the data quality indicators. Comparing the results of two co-located samples provides information on the precision of the results as a whole. Comparing sample results to their associated blanks can help identify some potential errors in accuracy. Comparing the results received to those expected and necessary to draw conclusions about the data can help in understanding the completeness and reliability of the results. Comparability can be assessed by looking at the results taken from different sampling locations of the same building—or from different buildings for the same type of location. The reviews are generally qualitative and provide a qualitative assessment of how well the data actually represents the sampled location.
The method detection limit is a more quantitative review. It is accomplished by calculating the lowest result the analytical method can accurately identify. It is based on an analysis of the blank samples and is specific for the sampling/analysis method. Reliable information can only be obtained from sample results with method detection limits significantly lower than the average value of the results and significantly lower than any comparison values to which the sample results will be compared.
The analytical results of the concentration of airborne particulate matter were provided by the laboratory as the initial weight of the filter prior to the sampling event and the final weight of the filter after the sampling event. The concentration of the particulate matter was calculated by dividing the weight of the material collected on the filter by the volume of air drawn through the filter by the pump using the following formulas.
Weight Gain of Filter = Final Weight - Initial Weight
Sample Volume = Average Pump Flow Rate x Sample Collection Time
Average Air Sampling Pump Flow Rate=(Presampling Flow Rate + Postsampling Flow Rate) + 2
Concentration = Weight Change Sample Volume
Airborne Particulate Matter Sample Results
Each area that was sampled for airborne asbestos was also sampled for airborne particulate matter (PM). The sample results from the PM measurements did not meet the data QA/QC objectives. A variety of statistical and graphical analyses were performed on, and with, the measured results in an attempt to identify the cause and extent of inconsistencies of the measured results. A subset of the measured results that are not potentially affected by these inconsistencies were not identified. Therefore, the entire data set describing airborne particulate matter concentrations was rejected. In addition, the specific cause of the inconsistencies was not identified. The following information explains why the airborne particulate matter results were rejected.
89
NYC-VVTC_000149670
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.
Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.
NYC-WTC_000149432
DEP asbestos project notification form and inspection report dated December 12, 2002.
25 shared non-person entities · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.978
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000149798
Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.
24 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · Same agency, volume and box · similarity 0.975
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗41 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.991
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164732
Draft spreadsheet of asbestos sampling results from residential locations collected November-December 2001, circulated for review.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139712
Series of emails forwarding a draft memo between DEP staff members for review and finalization.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.989
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000139656
Forwarded spreadsheet compiling residential asbestos sampling results collected in November-December 2001, including Building 11 reoccupancy assessment.
25 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164960
Draft compilation of asbestos air samples collected from residential areas November-December 2001 by NYC DOH and ATSDR.
26 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.988
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000164784
Transmission of revised asbestos sampling results for residential samples collected November-December 2001.
24 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.986
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153220
Draft protocol outlining objectives and locations for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas.
16 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗15 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000153258
Draft protocol for assessing airborne and settled dust exposures in residential areas following the World Trade Center collapse.
17 shared non-person entities · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000159829
Coordination memo for WTC recovery inter-agency meeting on building and parks assessment and scope.
22 shared non-person entities · 1 shared topics · similarity 0.974
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.
Similarity score 0.988 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Similarity score 0.950 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000178388
Comprehensive report on airborne and dust exposures in Lower Manhattan following the September 11 attacks, published by the Department of Health.
Similarity score 0.950 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.944 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗NYC-WTC_000121183
Air monitoring report for 345 South End Avenue buildings conducted in February and March 2002 showing TEM results.
Similarity score 0.941 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Similarity score 0.941 (not a probability)
machine-extracted · confidence unavailable · Check page ↗Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.
NYC-WTC_000146129
Correspondence from NYC Corporation Counsel providing comments on excerpts of a draft EPA evaluation report regarding the WTC response.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000164671
Draft document titled World Trade Center Emergency Safety and Health Plan dated September 30, 2001.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000152439
Letter from Con Edison to DEP regarding follow-up on water pumped from a gas main during the World Trade Center recovery.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000123875
Letter from environmental consultants summarizing ambient air sampling and cleanup activities at 225 Rector Place.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer
NYC-WTC_000153382
Document arguing that respirator safety issues fall under OSHA jurisdiction and should be removed from the EPA review.
Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer