NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 05/EPA Cate Jenkins
Document / 19 pages

EPA memo re: wipe sampling and cancer risk at WTC,

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Memorandum detailing procedures for asbestos wipe sampling in Lower Manhattan and estimating associated cancer risks from dust exposure.

NYC-WTC_000140259–000140277

Folder label: “EPA Cate Jenkins

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000140262
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

vendors), specially filtered particle-free water, dust free disposable gloves, and a high purity alcohol. The laboratory that will perform the actual test typically will work with you to get you these supplies.

Finding a Laboratory

First, choose a laboratoryhich is accredited by the EPA to perform TEM (transmission electron microscopy) asbestos analyses. These labs are posted on the web at: http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/210/214/scopes/temtm.htm. Or, contact the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) Laboratory Accreditation Administration, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (telephone 301-975-4016). There are about 60 accredited labs. Since wipe samples cannot be used for regulatory purposes, it is irrelevant whether the lab also has an accreditation in New York State. You can use any out-of-state lab that is convenient

Using TEM instead PCM analyses is important in terms of comparison of the wipe sample with the TEM air level testing required under the asbestos AHERA standard. It is particularly important to use TEM for the WTC dusts because the asbestos in them is very fine. A PCM analysis will only detect larger particles.

Contact the lab to see what type of wipe samples they are capable or willing to perform. Ask whether they will perform TEM analyses on samples that were collected by American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) wipe Method D 6480 (wipe). Ask advice on sample preparation, handling, etc.

Interpreting the results of settled dust levels, wine samples or microvacnnm samnles

Industrial hygienists and other health professionals recommend professional asbestos abatement procedures when a wipe sample is over the detection limit, or background, of260 s/cn? for wipe samples, or over 1000 s/cm^ for a microvacuum sample.

If there are any elevated levels of asbestos on surfaces, then landlords should be contacted and asbestos abatement by trained, certified professionals should be instituted. Also, contact health and environmental agencies and elected officials so that they are aware of the problem and can provide assistance and intervene to provide assistance to others in the area who are probably contaminated as well. Contact local non-profit environmental and occupational safety and health organizations as well for assistance and advice.

PREDICTING AIR CONCENTRATIONS FROM SETTLED DUST LEVELS

To predict the amount of asbestos which will be in the air from a given settled dust level is not an exact science. Until such time as adequate air monitoring is available, the following may be the only viable method. Settled asbestos dusts get resuspended into the air inside buildings as the result of activities such as sweeping, walking around, moving heavy equipment, etc.

What is needed are factors, or numbers, to multiply the settled dust levels by to estimate the airborne levels. The following presents such a methodology. First, the conversion factors for an

-4-

NYC-WTC_000140262

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000140262Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →