NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/DEP Box 03/2002 E-Mail Sent M. Gilsenan
Document / 74 pages

Forwarding WTC air monitoring scope for final review, Aug 2002

Machine-extracted title · confidence 95%

DEP official requests final review of the latest air monitoring Scope of Work to conclude negotiations.

NYC-WTC_000139257–000139330

Folder label: “2002 E-Mail Sent M. Gilsenan

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000139276
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Environmental Protection Agency §763.93 the school to the Agency designated by possible, the names and addresses of all the Governor prior to its use as a contractors involved, start and comple­ school. tion dates of the work, and results of (b) On or before October 17, 1987, the any air samples analyzed during and Governor of each State shall notify upon completion of the work. local education agencies in the State (v) A description of assessments, re­ regarding where to submit their man­ quired to be made under §783.88, of ma­ agement plans. States may establish terial that was Identified before De­ administrative procedures for review­ cember 14, 1987, as friable ACBM or fri­ ing management plans. If the Governor able suspected ACBM assumed to be does not disapprove a management ACM, and the name and signature. plan within 90 days after receipt of the State of accreditation, and if applica­ plan, the local education agency shall ble, accreditation number of each ac­ implement the plan. credited person making the assess­ (c) Each local education agency must ments. begin implementation of its manage­ (3) For each inspection and relnspec- ment plan on or before July 9, 1989, and tion conducted under §763.85: complete Implementation In a timely (1) The date of the Inspection or reln- fashion. spectlon and the name and signature. (d) Each local education agency shall State of accreditation and, if applica­ maintain and update its management ble, the accreditation number of each plan to keep it current with ongoing accredited inspector performing the in­ operations and maintenance, periodic spection or relnspectlon. surveillance, inspection, reinspection, (ii) A blueprint, diagram, or written and response action activities. All pro­ description of each school building that visions required to be included in the identifies clearly each location and ap­ management plan under this section proximate square or linear footage of shall be retained as part of the man­ homogeneous areas where material was agement plan, as well as any informa­ sampled for ACM, the exact location tion that has been revised to bring the where each bulk sample was collected, plan up-to-date, date of collection, homogeneous areas (e) The management plan shall be de­ where friable suspected ACBM is as­ veloped by an accredited management sumed to be ACM, and where nonfriable planner and shall include: suspected ACBM is assumed to be ACM, (1) A list of the name and address of (iil) A description of the manner used each school building and whether the to determine sampling locations, and school building contains friable ACBM, the name and signature of each accred­ nonfriable ACBM, and friable and non- ited inspector collecting samples, the frlable suspected ACBM assumed to be State of accreditation, and if applica­ ACM. ble, his or her accreditation number, (2) For each Inspection conducted be­ (iv) A copy of the analyses of any fore the December 14, 1987: bulk samples collected and analyzed, (I) The date of the inspection. the name and address of any laboratory (ii) A blueprint, diagram, or written that analyzed bulk samples, a state­ description of each school building that ment that the laboratory meets the ap­ identifies clearly each location and ap­ plicable requirements of §763,87(a) the proximate square or linear footage of date of analysis, and the name and sig­ any homogeneous or sampling area nature of the person performing the where material was sampled for ACM, analysis, emd, if possible, the exact locations (v) A description of assessments, re­ where bulk samples were collected, and quired to be made under §763,88, of all the dates of collection. ACBM and suspected ACBM assumed to (ill) A copy of the analyses of any be ACM, and the name, signature. bulk samples, dates of analyses, and a State of accreditation, and if applica­ copy of any other laboratory reports ble, accreditation number of each ac­ pertaining to the analyses. credited person making the assess­ (Iv) A description of any response ac­ ments, tions or preventive measures taken to (4) The name, address, and telephone reduce asbestos exposure, including if number of the person designated under

661

NYC-WTC_000139276

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000139276Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

Compare copies and versions →