NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
f r.
tea r IIIayor
___ §
I. Legal Chronology
August 1999 Class action filed on behalf of mentally ill inmates seeking preliminary and
permanent injunction enjoining defendants to provide discharge planning as
provided by Mental Hygiene Law §29.15, 14 NYCRR Part 587 and the New York
State Constitution
August - Parties engage in extensive discovery, including document production and
Nov.2000 depositions
July 8, 2000 Court certifies class and issues preliminary injunction, finding that City Jails are
subject to provisions of Mental Hygiene Law applicable to inpatient psychiatric
facilities and outpatient clinics
• Court subsequently issues Order defining class as consisting of inmates who
are incarcerated for more than 24 hours, and who receive treatment for mental
illness during incarceration
July 26, 2000 City appeals preliminary injunction
• City invokes automatic stay; upheld after court challenge by plaintiffs
• Lower court directs proceedings to continue notwithstanding appeal
• Parties engage in further extensive discovery
July — Dec., 2000 Parties engage in settlement discussions
Oct. 31, 2000 Appellate Division unanimously affirms preliminary injunction on Opinion below
• Plaintiffs express renewed interest in settlement
• Plaintiffs forebear from serving notice of entry (preliminary injunction order
does not take effect)
Nov. 14, 2000 Judge agrees to adjourn further court proceedings until December 19, 2000 to
allow parties to pursue settlement; deadline subsequently extended to January 30,
2001
Jan. 17, 2001 Plaintiffs present defendants with detailed settlement proposal
• proposal's detail and emphasis on process is unacceptable to defendants
Future litigation
parties to resume discovery
Defendants may seek leave from Appellate Division to appeal to Court of
Appeals, invoking automatic stay, which is likely to be challenged by
plaintiffs; unlikely leave will be granted
Plaintiffs expected to serve Notice of Entry of preliminary injunction order
Plaintiff likely to file motion for contempt for failure to comply with
preliminary injunction
Likelihood that permanent injunction will be issued in Spring 2001
• Defendants will need to submit proposal re: remedy, to reduce
potential for Court to adopt plaintiffs' extreme proposal
NYC-WTC 000138006
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.