NYC Law Department release
Independent mirror · updated as the City releases more · v1.2.6
← Document results/Unboxed/Folder_0049
Document / 83 pages

DEP Biweekly Reports Folder 0049, 2000-2001

Machine-extracted title · confidence 100%

Archival folder label for Department of Environmental Protection biweekly reports related to World Trade Center activities from 2000 to 2001.

NYC-WTC_000137900–000137982

Folder label: “Folder_0049

Page image
Scanned page image, NYC-WTC_000137920
OCR text

OCR status: ok · source: pdftotext

NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document

Figure 2 Toyota Prins Hybrid-Electric Vehicle under consideration for purchase.

Emerging Issues

Shandaken Tunnel Litigation As previously reported, in March 2000, the Riverkeeper, along with several fishing groups, filed a Clean Water Act lawsuit against the City in federal court (Northern District of New York). The suit pertains to the operation of the 17 mile Shandaken Tunnel, which is owned by the City and conveys Catskill system water from the Schoharic Reservoir to the Esopus Creek. The water then flows down the Esopus to the Ashokan Reservoir, where it enters the Catskill Aqueduct for delivery to the City. Because of the geography and topography of the Schoharie Reservoir basin, the water entering the Shandaken Tunnel can at times be very turbid, especially after a heavy rain. When the Tunnel is open and this water is released into the Esopus Creek. it may result in turbidity within the Creek, which is used by recreational fishermen. A number of fishing groups have claimed (we believe without justification) that alleged releases of turbid water from the Tunnel have contributed to a decline in the fish population in the Esop•as, and damage to the local tourist trade. We assert that rather than causing problems, releases of water from the Tunnel play a vital role in preserving the health of the Esopus (Tunnel water is very cold, and is vital in the summer months to relieve stress on the fish in the Esopus).

Although we attended a series of meetings, over the course of a year, aimed to addressing the concerns of fishing groups and trying to find common ground on the issue of turbidity, those efforts stalled (largely due to the intransigence of the Riverkeeper), and this lawsuit ensued. In the lawsuit, the Riverkeeper claimed that the release of turbid water through the Tunnel, into the Esopus, is a point source discharge of a pollutant into the waters of the United States. The Riverkeeper argues that, as suob, the City must have a State SPDES permit before it can release water through the Tunnel and into the Fsopus. The suit seeks, among other things, an order forcing the City to apply for and obtain a SPDES permit, and to pay penalties. We are defending the lawsuit vigorously. The implications for the City and its water supply system are very serious.

2-

ZO'd 9£ :ST OOOZ Z ;a0 c c-565-8TL:x'sd d3Q NYC-WTC 000137920

OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.

NYC-WTC_000137920Source: NYC Law Department, mirrored locally

Related records

Browse subjects →

Ranked by indexed similarity. Reasons describe shared subjects and filing context; check the source records.

Same-box records

Filed elsewhere

More like this page

Similar subjects in other documents. Similarity does not establish the same event, measurement or conclusion.

Page similarity is temporarily unavailable or this page has no indexed vector.

Buildings in this record

Machine-extracted building matches; verify each source. Buildings, never households.

Others also read

Readers open these alongside this record — through an Ask answer, the same folder, or indexed similarity. Not a claim they are about the same event.

NYC-WTC_000149798 · Box DEP Box 10

Generic form or header page from the Department of Environmental Protection regarding general World Trade Center notices and requests.

Cited alongside this record in an Ask answer

Compare copies and versions →