NYC 9/11 Public Portal Document
Responding to Terrorism Victims - Oklahoma City and Beyond Page 2 of 3
particularly in crimes that occur outside the United States.
■ The difficulty in finding victim services and mental health professionals with
experience and expertise in dealing with the issues and needs related to
terrorism victimization.
Like other victims of violent crime, victims of terrorism need help in handling the
crisis created by the terrorist event, in stabilizing their lives, and in dealing with the
criminal justice process, whether there are an arrest and a trial or an arrest and a
trial are delayed for years. Because each victim's coping abilities and support
systems are different and his or her loss is individual, the needs of individual
victims may vary. A process should be in place to help victims assess their specific
needs and find appropriate sources of help and support. Most victims will be able
to function and stabilize after a period of time with moderate assistance, but a
percentage of victims will continue to need assistance for years after the event.
Many people were involved in identifying the lessons learned in the wake of the
Oklahoma City bombing: the U.S. Attorneys' Offices for the Western District of
Oklahoma and the District of Colorado, Project Heartland, Colorado Oklahoma
Resource Council, Critical Incident Workshop Group, Inc., and the Oklahoma
State Crime Victim Compensation Program. The experiences and lessons learned
from the Oklahoma City bombing were echoed in the responses to the terrorism
cases that have occurred since 1995. The lessons learned along the way were
taught by victims, victim advocates, criminal justice professionals, mental health
professionals, clergy, the media, and outside observers and include the following:
1. An effective response to victims of terrorism is dependent upon prior
planning and coordination. Understanding the needs of victims, clarifying
the roles of responders, and building trust among responding agencies are
essential to developing and implementing workable and effective
interventions with victims.
2. The victim population must be broadly defined to include not only the
primary victims and their families, but also first responders and rescue
workers, law enforcement, clergy, victim assistance personnel, and others
who are exposed to traumatized victims.
3. Identifying, setting aside, and effectively managing resources are key to
providing a comprehensive response. Encouraging cooperative efforts
between the public and private sector can maximize resources, leverage
expertise, and build a stronger sense of community support.
4. State and federal laws mandate that certain rights and services be afforded
to victims. Agencies and individuals charged with responding to terrorism
must be familiar with what the law requires.
5. Victims of terrorism are considered victims of a federal crime, but there may
be many different agencies at different levels of government involved in the
response. Coordination among federal, state, and local agencies is critical to
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/publications/infores/respterrorisn/cbap8.htuW 9/29/01
NYC-WTC 000137330
OCR can misread numbers and units. Confirm readings against the page image before using them.